3521630

Certainly:

I commented on, I believe , 2 blogs because they have misconceptions. Much of the rancor

static.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/8/8c/Rancor-SWE.png

comes for from talking at crosspurposes. This comes down to 3 areas of misunderstanding:

• Burden of proof (one cannot prove a negative; so now, the person making the claim must prove.the claim). None can prove that a TeaPot does floats in 1 of the intergalactic voids. The burden of proof lies on the claimant.
• Whether God exists. This falls out of the above. I bring it up after the above for reducing emotional defensiveness. I do not claim that God does not exist (that would be a claim). I merely see no evidence that God exists. It is upto the theist to prove the Existence of God.
• Whether, if God exists, God is worthy of worship. I believe that isopods exist because I played with rolly-pollies (you might call them pill-bugs) quite a bit as a child, but I do not worship them

I hope that we can have a constructive dialogue, but atheists and theists have had polite dialogues for centuries, but have never gotten past the burden of proof. Maybe, we shall have a breakthrough, but I doubt it.

Even if we shall not have a breakthrough, now you know why atheists do not believe in God. You now know not to expect atheists to automatically worship God, even if proven (the next run at CERN might prove the existence of God). Proving God would instantly covert the atheists into theist, but some might feel that God is not worthy of worship and not attend church.

I hope that you should understand atheists better.

¡Good Luck!

Thanks for the watch. Might I ask why you did so?

It pleases me that you favored Yuri FOMO.

3513487 There's not much content, though.

3513481
Oh okay and can you tell me more please?