• Member Since 17th Feb, 2014
  • offline last seen Dec 13th, 2022

MegatronsPen


Other than a Cybertronian writing utensil, I am an avid brony that is partial to writing novice-level stories whenever an idea pops into my head, whether I like it, or not. It's mostly the latter.

Comments ( 59 )

I'm calling this right now.

You and I are going to be shipped.

Just kidding!

Honestly, damn good start. Hopefully this gets good.

If you make her cum taste like coco milk, I will be laughing my head off.

5845631 ... why do you torture me?

I really hope you continue this...
I love it.

5845639
Oh silly, you know you love me! =] :raritywink:

Oh well, a new fav for me :pinkiecrazy:


I'll shall be looking forward to that other attack clop. :moustache:

The [Other] tag is generally understood to mean canon characters that don't yet have a tag in Fimfic, such as Blossomforth or other background characters. "David" isn't a canon character, so you should use the [OC] tag, especially since he seems to be the main character, based on the description.

Also, you warn there will be human in the story. There's a tag for that too.

Why is it bestiality

5846005

My thoughts exactly. Saw a notification pop-up on my screen saying this story was added to the bestiality folder. Was disappointed when I actually check the story out.:ajsleepy:

5846148
5846005

"Zoophilia" as it sometimes otherwise known as the paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on animals. Since the clue is in the name; "My Little Pony," a show about talking pony shaped characters of a different species, it would therefore come under a human inter-breeding with another animal making it Bestiality, which is strictly defined as: "a cross-species sexual activity between human and non-human animal."

Just because it walk and talks doesn't mean it isn't so. Just because we as bronies in our warped perception don't see it as a fantasy of bestiality does not reclassify the fact we fantasize sex with these non-human characters, which is a form of bestiality in and of itself.

A similar example would be if we took Twilight Sparkle, a pony, and allowed Flash Sentry the human to fuck her. That is bestiality. Another example would be for a walking talking dog that is in no way human shaped to go fuck a human. That is bestiality. Just because it's a cartoon doesn't somehow soften the blow.

Funny, how human perceptions of immoral things can be turned innocent with the notion of: "oh it's just a cartoon." I know for a fact I am going to rustle a few jimmies on the subject, but until the social perception of what bestiality is changed to encompass the concept that we can impose humanzing characteristics onto animals (make-believe or otherwise), it's gonna be classed as bestiality (or bestiality-fantasy) to society.

A further example would be foalcon. It's a fantasy of pedophilia and no one can dispute that fact, which is often frowned upon by most bronies because of it. (Not all, mind you).

Now, from a human who is NOT a brony, David in the story classifies sex with Coco Pommel as bestiality, since he follows a moral code we as bronies somehow don't think apply to us.

I am sorry you don't see it that way, but I think my classification of my story is justified.

quickmeme.com/img/ea/ea767d1fa0cc498272ed158e88af5d20ca6f4754aa772b9ece57bef7bc9bd90a.jpg

This is quite good mate! Well written, you have a knack for silly stories that can be super easy to follow and have a good time with. While at the same time to story sits you down and has a serious conversation with you. It's awesome

5846841 Thank you very much!

5846775 The reason bestiality is considered wrong is because we use the word "animal" to mean "a machine made of meat the doesn't think and is only driven by biological programing."

Basically, for sex to be okay, it's got to meet these three criteria:
1. Adult
2. Consenting
3. Knows what sex is and knows what it is getting into when it asks for it.

These ponies are adults with bodies that are capable of handling the act. These ponies genuinely consent to the act of sex with humans without having been brainwashed or mentally tortured into becoming sex slaves. These ponies understand the English language and know exactly what their human mates are talking about.

Ponies, to me at least, are people.

And actually, I find it kinda offensive that you say that sex with them is immoral on the basis of them not having a human form. I find it kinda racist. Like 70 years ago, people would have been saying the same thing about how it's wrong for whites to have relations with blacks because they don't look the same.

5846941 As a society, we label putting your dick in something that isn't YOUR species, bestiality. That's why the word exists. Whatever humanizing characteristics we give them does not stop the fact they are of a complete genetic code from us and therefore, is a different species entirely from our own.

Now, I am not saying what I said is my personal view on the subject specifically, because if it was, why the fuck do you think I would I write clop stories? That would be being hypocritical to the extreme. I am only pointing out why my story is under the heading of "bestiality" and why I am against those that would label it "not bestiality" when clearly, the character in the story like the rest of the world outside of our community (which by the way I am immensely proud to be of), is NOT like us in any way, shape, or form.

To the character, he is in a world of talking ponies. A pony to him, is an animal. And like the rest of the world, he is under the strict assumption that sticking his dick in Coco would be bestiality. Because that is the social norm. To judge and to follow the rules set out by society.

Ponies, to me at least, are people. And actually, I find it kinda offensive that you say that sex with them is immoral on the basis of them not having a human form. I find it kinda racist. Like 70 years ago, people would have been saying the same thing about how it's wrong for whites to have relations with blacks because they don't look the same.

You find it that I am being racist towards characters that don't exist and now you are telling me I talking oppressive connotations that is as bad as the suppression of African-Americans/Africans way back then? And by the way, it isn't 'black' since that can be used as a derogatory term that dehumanizes that particular race.

Go on, do tell me how I am racist to your make-believe talking ponies as opposed to the race you just passed a derogatory remark about without thinking. Because I find that FAR more offensive. Don't go playing the race card.

quickmeme.com/img/0c/0c87e722b033b0e183d3622e87788f5a41e2f1bb656d6f5f36f6b8641c6e446e.jpg

5846775

"Zoophilia" as it sometimes otherwise known as the paraphilia involving a sexual fixation on animals

Yes, and you are aware that the ONLY thing that separates humans and animals is higher level intelligence.

Since the clue is in the name; "My Little Pony," a show about talking pony shaped characters of a different species, it would therefore come under a human inter-breeding with another animal making it Bestiality, which is strictly defined as: "a cross-species sexual activity between human and non-human animal."

But they aren't animals. I just said the only thing that separates us is intelligence. They have as much, if not more from what I've seen, intelligence as us. While yes, it is sexual activity between two different species, they are not animals, neither human nor pony.

Now, from a human who is NOT a brony, David in the story classifies sex with Coco Pommel as bestiality, since he follows a moral code we as bronies somehow don't think apply to us.

since he follows a moral code we as bronies somehow don't think apply to us.

he follows a moral code we as bronies somehow don't think apply to us.

Probably because that way of thinking sounds retarded.

Doesn't apply to us? What moral code? That romantic interest between two people, and YES, I call them people because to actually call them animals would be insulting, is immoral? Why? How is that immoral? The reason bestiality is looked down upon is because the animal has no way of voicing either their consent or disapproval. But the ponies aren't animals, their just as smart as us. Would you deny them the opportunity to be treated equally because of a different physical form?

Posts picture of Obama with a snarky comment

Oh, I see. You're a special kind of asshole.

5847023 I am not denying them anything. Again, if I was against the notion of any of this, I wouldn't write clop. I pointed out, to you, that this story is about bestiality to which you seemed disappointed that there weren't any thing you believe, to be bestiality. Do I think it's bestiality? No. I don't. But to him and for the subject of the story, it IS bestiality because that is socially what the word is. Inter-species sex. It doesn't matter if you want to label emotions to the characters; it is still inter-species sex. On a genetic level.

I explained my reasons and in true internet fashion, threw a meme up in true asshole-fashion because I knew I was going to create a comment war over something I ironically agree with you.

5847023 Furthermore, why the hell are you jumping on the humanizing pony bandwagon when you came here disappointed this story was "apparently not about bestiality?" When it is.

5847053

But to put it in the bestiality category when YOU don't believe it, when the majority of the site doesn't believe it, when no-one here believes that, is fucking stupid.:ajbemused:

5847066 Sweet mother of god man, do I need to link my own comment?

5847064

Because I have kinks. Disgusting, yet wonderful, kinks.

5847072 Please read this. Please read this and tell me you do not see your gross error.

To the character, he is in a world of talking ponies. A pony to him, is an animal. And like the rest of the world, he is under the strict assumption that sticking his dick in Coco would be bestiality. Because that is the social norm. To judge and to follow the rules set out by society.

5847077

Yes, YOUR CHARACTER, not YOU. Is he putting the story there?:rainbowhuh:

5847077
I think you might be missing his point, in regards to the comment you replied to.
That being that he's into his definition of bestiality (read: non-sapient animal), not "society's".

5847089 & 5847086

I do get what he is saying. I was justifying why it was labelled in the bestiality folder because to the character, it is bestiality and is a fic about bestiality. Because he came on here disappointed there was no "bestiality" just confused the hell out of me, so I defended it, by trying to describe that the character himself believes it wrong, immoral and completely fucked up.

And yes, I do realize now I am against people with their headcanons of what their definition of the word means. It seems I have started an argument that there is no compromising towards.

5847003

As a society, we label putting your dick in something that isn't YOUR species, bestiality.

Zoophilia (true love of animals) and xenophilia (loving something alien) both fall under this definition. Since sex here isn't indulging in beast-like instincts and impulses, it's sex with aliens.

Go on, do tell me how I am racist to your make-believe talking ponies as opposed to the race you just passed a derogatory remark about without thinking. Because I find that FAR more offensive. Don't go playing the race card.

It's racist because that viewpoint says that the entire race of ponies are unworthy of being considered 'people' on the virtue of their species. The fact that there aren't any real anthropomorphic ponies to be oppressed by humans treating them like animals has nothing to do with it.

5847089
5847086
5846941

You know what? I wanted to make a statement about how people outside the fandom would see this sort of thing, in story, by placing it in the bestiality folder. Not so much an "intelligent" thought provoking story but rather for people like US to sympathies with the experience he is about to go through.

In short, I fucked up I apologize for arguing, because at the end of the day, I got the same personal views as you guys on the subject.

5847117 I said no such thing of them being trustworthy as people. I don't see where you got that from. But thanks for pulling out the race card on me. It's the character's views. Not mine.

If you think I am being racist, report me and let the mods take action.

Because at this point I just don't know why you left fielded me with that one.

5847118

I wanted to make a statement about how people outside the fandom would see this sort of thing, in story, by placing it in the bestiality folder.

Why bother?

Do I think it's bestiality? No. I don't.

If you, ZAKARI, and pretty much everyone else who reads mature stories with sexual content on this site does not regard clop as zoophilia, but rather as xenophilia, doesn't that mean that you would be correct to not label it as zoophilia? What does it matter what the larger masses think if only the most minuscule fraction of a fraction of them will actually read, or indeed even see this story?

I guess you labeling it as zoophilia based on the character's views makes some sense, but if barely anyone who will call it that will even hear of this story's existence then what's the point? I apologize if this comes off as antagonistic, but I genuinely don't understand your reasoning here.

5847118

I only made the comment in the first place because the story was put into a subject category that actually had nothing do with it. While that alone might have made me sad, your attitude was what prompted me to continue going against you in everything you said.

Seriously, the whole Obama pic pissed me off more than what category the story was placed in:ajbemused:

5847135 Very correct. Don't be sorry. You are right though. Headcanons and own personal morals of issues of bestiality here are flying, so, I am somewhat up against an unconquerable mountain.

Again, I apologize to everyone. If it will disarm the argument to label me the dick then fine, I was being a dick about trying to justify my story's classification of bestiality, which clearly was wrong of me to do so.

I might just pull the story down entirely since I was evidently trying to be too smart for my own good, by trying to depict a character struggling with such emotions considering his circumstances, views and own moral headcanon, which are pretty much the complete opposite to my own.

Sorry again.

Here's another meme to continue my internet assholery:

quickmeme.com/img/59/59e73a3db5d7db27aa21948748a2dd51cbdd0b3b8191f7c0d03e6dabb9d2c6b4.jpg

5847143 I can't apologize enough. See below comment.

5847164

I might just pull the story down entirely

Why? :rainbowhuh: The story isn't bad, it's actually good. There's no reason to take it down.

5847268 I've got a sneaking suspicion I've done goofed, given the drama I've caused. I'll think on it.

5847279

The drama doesn't have anything to do with the story's quality. Stories should only be taken down if the quality is utter shit and NEEDS a major overhaul. This story does not, it's actually quite good. Just move on and about a week down the line everyone will forget this even happened.

5847421 I probably won't, considering. My focus is mainly on A Slow Sunset and Firelight at this moment in time. I should hopefully have them both updated sometime in the next 24 hours. I'm not sure when the next Coco chapter will be out, to be honest.

Artist is xioade, their DA is deactivated, their stuff can be found on Derpibooru though
hxxps://derpibooru.org/tags/artist-colon-xioade
(replace hxxps with https)

5847508 I'm about to post a blog about my coming updates, in fact. If you need to know when something is coming, best look there. I tend to update when I can.

Oh, so the bestiality classification is meant for the character's own view on the matter and his struggle to reconcile his feelings and morals? Interesting, at first I was confused but now I am intrigued.

5847579 Correct. And, nice Zerg avatar. Just don't go blowing up my command center.

5847588
After years of being a zerg rushing 6 pooling bastard that feeds on protoss tears there was no other avatar for me. Also Atryl makes wonderful drawings, even of these nightmarish deadly green landmines.
Just saw the drama below, and I have to say that it could have been avoided by citing the definition of bestiality for the group "warning: cum inflation, etc": bestiality (pony x animal, human x pony). So even if you discard the logical argument that it's the character's view, or forget about the debate between xenophilia and bestiality, it's still correct to put it in that folder.
Then on the topic of "is it the right definition"... it's like discussing religion, personal feelings are too strong to have a reasonable debate.

5847637 Yeah, which was my mistake in even arguing about. But anyway, moving on and not thinking about what happened below... I do love those little bastards though. Get fifty of them with that big explosive strain and just watch everything before you melt into a pool of goo.

Also some dude drew that for you? Fucking epic. Jealous as hell.

5847637 Wait I just realized I misread your comment. My bad.

5847671
If I had the money to get a commission by Atryl I would do it in a heartbeat. He does lots of pony stuff, SFW and NSFW, that's how I found this pic.
As for banelings I love the burrow mutation. I remember a game between Scarlet and Bomber, red bull battlegrounds if I remember correctly, where the game was decided by burrowed banelings. It was glorious.

5847686 They're evil little pests. That's why I love em.

5847698 And that,my friends,is why you go Terran,Get Medi's out the arse,and have command centers ready to lift off...And obviously have a 3 layer thick depot gate.

colored pony called Princess Twilight Sparkle, to whom befriended me almost immediately

Either -
Twilight Sparkle, who befriended me...
Or
Twilight Sparkle, with whom I became immediate friends.

To find out whether to use whom or who, replace it with the proper pro-noun and see if it fits. If it's he/she you use who, if it's him/her, it's whom.
(She befriended me) <- who
(I became immediate friends with her) <- whom

something I don’t and why is Coco Pommel; to which I had the pleasure of meeting

It's not a good idea to use 'which' when referring to people. 'With whom' works fine here.

5853756 Thank you very much. I am still not used to the ins and outs of first person writing, but that was very helpful.
5852120 Damn Terrans and their floaty bloody buildings.

5855811
Enjoyed immensely. Have a like and a fav. Eagerly awaiting an update.

Login or register to comment