Page generated in 0.038 seconds
Total duration
959 users online
1,267,804 hits today, 2,205,040 yesterday
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic Fanfiction
Designed and coded by knighty & Xaquseg - © 2011-2024
Support us
SubStar
Chat!
Discord
Follow us
Twitter
MLP: Friendship is Magic® - © 2024 Hasbro Inc.®
Fimfiction is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Hasbro Inc.®
fur, not for
Other than that, looked amazing as usual! It's nice to see another problem helped AND copious amounts of sex at the same time!
A nice surprise, considering I'd just checked off another story on my Changeling shelf and noticed that the number of unread chapters had not gone done. "Well, how very odd," I noted to myself, understandably confused.
Investigation revealed a new chapter of "Ember's". And there was much rejoicing.
Nice job. It's a good break from the more morally complex issues of other chapters with its simple issue and straight clop.
This was nice and sweet chapter
Hmm... so Fleur has a secret? Maybe she's a stallion? Or maybe she's actually very plain looking, perhaps even ugly, but bolsters her image with magic?
And what of Fancy Pants? Are he and Fleur not together?
Great chapter, brother.
5211579 My money is that Fluer has both equipment
5211579
For all we know, she might be null. Or just have a birthmark.
And who says she's not with Fancy? A three way could be why Ember knows her secret!
5211418 There's always something! This one even got some pre-reading from the nice folks in my chat room.
5211479
5211492
5211517 Thanks!
5211579
5212059
5212110 I neither confirm nor deny anything. Although one way or another I'll tell that story. I just haven't decided if that bit goes in the "final chapter" I'm working on that tells how Ember met Far Gaze, or if it goes in a flashback in another chapter like this one.
5212201 welcome and hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
5212201
Works for me!
Though as a related thought, Ember having a client who was 'incomplete' somehow (gelded, clitorectomy, eunuched, etc) might be interesting. Similar to this, but with some more potent psychological scarring probable.
I think it's obvious what Fleur's secret is. She's a model, her secret is photoshop.
Fleur has a secret? Uh oh, hope Fancy knows and doesn't mind to much about it.
5212201
What're you thanking me for? You do all the work! I just read.
I'm quite glad that this showed back up on the Featured listings as apparently it got removed from my public Favorites list correctly but failed to be properly added to my private NSFW list. There were 2 brand new chapters for me to read too.
Perhaps sometime soon I'll actually make myself sit down and write something instead of being distracted by watching anime, playing video games, or reading various stories on the net. If I write something set in the MLP/EG universe it'll be my first time writing a fanfic so I should probably stick with ONE series to draw from rather than going straight for a crossover.
Just a little bit of an idea to expand this series from being mostly clop that I just came up with: Perhaps someone who had come in with a problem other than just their urges tells their close trusted friend who has some sort of issue that's not "urge-related" about their experience and that friend decides to come in to see if they can get help with that non-urge-related issue based on their friend's word-of-mouth-advertising.
5212561 Well, I have 17 other stories on here for non-clop stuff. So if I had a non-clop issue I wanted to talk about, I'd have talked about it by now. (Or at least put it in the idea file!) This story is here to have somewhere to put the clop stuff so it doesn't clutter up the rest of my work.
5212292 Ha ha ha. Maaaaaaaaaaaybe. Maybe not!
5212417 Oh, Fancy knows.
5212723 I think you've misunderstood a few things. I explain Sweetcake and his gender in a couple of places, both in the Honey Pie stories and in comments about them. Sweetcake is biologically female, but identifies as and is comfortable with the role of a male, so the appropriate pronoun is "he", not "she", but of course like you, many ponies and many other changelings assume otherwise.
As for Ember meeting Sweetcake, no they haven't met in person. Or if they did, it was before the Canterlot invasion, and neither one would have thought anything of it, just passing in the halls of the hive.
Also, when I say that Ember is not fertile, I mean that she has not been fertilized by a changeling male, not that she can't be fertilized. Poor choice of words on my part, I suppose.
5212776
Oh? Ah well. I've only read Ember's so far. So I wouldn't know much about Sweetcake.
Though, about Sweetcake's gender identity ... hmm ... I'm not sure I should write this here. But, for the sake of opinion's expression in a civil manner, I will do it all the same. Let me get my top hat and my eyeglass. *puts those on*
*Ahem* Now, as I was saying, I think the appropriate pronoun to use depends on the situation.
When dealing with ... Sweetcake in person, using "he" is of the essence, that is for sure.
Though, ponies, changelings and other species refering to Sweetcake as "she" are not mistaken at all. She is biologically a female, after all. Consistently, when not addressing Sweetcake directly, be it through letters and messages that could be read by her/him, or through words that could be reported to her/him, using "her" is appropriate. Otherwise, Nature would be naught but a farce, wouldn't it?
Oh my. *Goes king Leonidas* This. Is. CONFUSIIIIIIIIIIING!!!!
*puts on top hat and eyeglass again*
But it's what makes it interesting, isn't it? :-)
As for your poor choice of words, do not blame yourself. I am not a native english speaker and, though I am fluent up to the point of fooling natives into thinking I actually am a native too, even after long and diverse conversations, many subtleties of Churchill's language still elude me.
Anyway, your writing is most-enjoyable, good chap. :-)
Another great chapter going after yet another normally taboo issue. I loved the little snippet of Ember's past, it would be interesting to eventually learn the details of how she started up her business. Nice to see a little bit of history with Far too, he has so much potential as a character.
5212624
Actually I think it sounds like an interesting idea -- not for the sake of getting the non-clop problem itself handled, but by now we're sufficiently invested in Ember as a character that it's a relevant question: what does she do if somepony comes in and wants non-sexy advice? It's not her trade, and she wouldn't get her end of the (unspoken) bargain for it, but on the other hand she seems to have enough empathy that it wouldn't be easy for her just to throw the needy customer out -- we've seen her send customers away because that's what they need.
"it was even possible for a stallion to have a penis too small for use in conventional intercourse."
Outch ... that sounds difficult to cope with. :-S
P.S.:
Keep the story rolling, mate. You are, as I already wrote, awesomely good at this.
Could it be that Fancy Pants is even better endowed than Big MacIntosh, himself better than Far Sight, himself better than the average stallion? :-O
5212629 That smile makes me very worried on what that secret might be.
5212916
Ah... that is a rather stunningly ignorant thing to say. I will assume that it is only ignorance, and you do not mean to be hateful or offensive, but that is the kind of thing that hateful and offensive people spout out.
Even merely going by the physical, "nature" is not so simple as just male or female. Read up on intersex people, just for starters. And as sentient beings, we are much, much more than merely our physical genitals. It is a basic principle of decency and respect that if a person tells you to use "he" you do it, regardless of what uninformed ideas about "nature" you might happen to hold. Calling Sweetcake "she" after he has told you otherwise would be extraordinarily rude. You would be saying "I know better than you who you are. I get to define you, I get to say what your identity is, and you do not." That is absolutely not something a decent person should do.
I always enjoy reading these chapters - and I did enjoy this one - though I hope you don't mind a few critical comments on this one. There were only really two things that bothered me:
First, this one felt over-rushed in all but the final section, though that one felt a little rushed than usual, as well. I might be guilty of a bit of memory loss overall, but I do know that I've never felt this way about any other chapter of this story.
And last, I felt like the whole "size doesn't matter" theme was negated a bit both by Ember's particular kind of pleasure at her experience with Fancy Pants - even when morphed into a large pony mare - and your acknowledgement of her not receiving that same kind of (obviously enjoyed) kind of pleasure & pain from Bramble that Fancy Pants had given Ember because of his size. I understand the distinction that she actually had to increase her size to accommodate him - and that she didn't make herself smaller for Bramble to accommodate him, which was well-done IMO - but you still managed to make the comparison in Ember's overall pleasure while trying to convince us that "size didn't matter".
Otherwise, I liked this, as I usually do.
If I misunderstood your intentions, I apologize. I am always prepared to be called out on being wrong so I can learn from my mistakes, so...
5214213 I often feel like we have a long way to go as a species, simply because our physical and genetically re-enforced nature pushes us to react to 'natural' stimulus response instead of thinking and deciding on how we should act towards others who identify themselves as different from what our nature tells us is the 'norm'. My feeling is that we're right in the middle of our development as a species: smart enough to effect changes to our environment, but tied to our past and 'nature' enough to make mistakes along the way with each other.
5214581 I think you've quite profoundly misunderstood what I was trying to convey. They two sessions were different, but I did not in any way mean to give any impression that Ember enjoyed one of them more than the other. I'm sorry it was read that way, just because I pointed out that they were differing sensations for her. I'll see if I can think of a way to phrase it that doesn't imply that, but... honestly I kind of thought I already had!
*Suddenly points at the computer screen.*
Hey! Everyone! Do you see this?!
Yes! I'm not kidding!
Praise Celestia!
It's ACTUALLY. WELL. DONE. CLOP
5214630 Then my sincere apologies! I should know better than to comment before reading twice. I did, however, realize that my interpretation wasn't your intention at all - I'd have to be a real idiot not to see that, considering the nature of every other chapter. I was only giving you my on-the-spot feeling about what I read.
5214646 Well, I guess I see what you're saying, in that I mention a particular sensation being missing...
Actually, on thinking more about it, I suppose I might be over-assuming people's level of knowledge here. The sensation of hitting the cervix (which is what that is) is actually something a lot of women absolutely hate, and even when you like it, it's a fiddly kind of thing that can very easily slide from good into "ow, ow, ow, no bad!", so a sexual session that doesn't have it is preferable for a lot of people, and even for those who enjoy that feeling, sometimes it's nicer to not deal with the bordering-on-painfulness of it. But that's something that not everybody knows, especially not all males, since even a sexually active guy might not be aware of that particular feeling.
So a sexual session that's missing that is kind of like, oh... a sexual session that's missing whipping someone. Maybe more boring/not as good to some people, but to most people it's what they'd probably prefer!
5214666 No, honestly I'm experienced enough to have gotten that particular aspect, and I understood when you applied it to Bramble's final section. I just felt that including that aspect of her pleasure negated the point, somehow, probably because I understood exactly where you were, um, coming from...
5214699 Now I'm just confused. So... you understand that that particular sensation isn't always terribly fun, but you also felt that saying she didn't experience it meant she didn't enjoy being with Bramble? I am now completely lost.
5214732
I was thrown off by these lines, more or less, because they were coupled as a part of her comparison of her experiences, which obviously was your intention.
I really, really am not dis-satisfied with this chapter. I thought it was very sweet! In retrospect perhaps I shouldn't have said anything...
5214802 Oh! I see what you mean, now. But she didn't orgasm at all with Fancy Pants. Orgasming from just penetration is incredibly uncommon. I try to avoid putting it into most of my clop scenes, because it's so unrealistic.
5214812
Ah, I understood that in the reading, but somehow it sailed right past me in the writing of my comments. My thoughts were concentrating on the lines I outlined.
I agree, though I've experienced both sides of those responses. There is nothing wrong with either: they can both present happy challenges, in the end.
5214633 Ha ha ha. Thanks!
5214213
"I will assume that it is only ignorance, and you do not mean to be hateful or offensive"
You can rest assured, I meant no harm. And if I had intentions of being hateful or offensive, I would have stayed polite, but I would have been much blunter and straightforward.
Of course, if I met Sweetcake in person, knowing what has been said, I wouldn't call Sweetcake "her".
"Consistently, when not addressing Sweetcake directly, be it through letters and messages that could be read by her/him, or through words that could be reported to her/him, using "her" is appropriate. Otherwise, Nature would be naught but a farce, wouldn't it?"
Alright. Some sentence might have been not very well chosen here, to say the least.
I meant that, when communicating by any mean which content could be known by Sweetcake, avoiding the use of "her" is in order.
But while I do agree that, as sentient beings, we're more than our physical genitals, I think it is still a part of what and who we are. A part that is not unimportant.
I don't have anything - at least, I don't think so - against people (Or should I say ponies? At this point, I have troubles deciding. :-P) following "alternative paths" (for lack of a better expression). I just find easier and simpler, well, to be male when having male genitalia and female when having female's. Now, I am aware that some persons don't go exactly in one category or the other.
Being in one of the two can already be damn complex, so I imagine that the persons who are not entirely in any of the two have it even tougher. The worst part being that they didn't chose to be in that kind of situation and to suffer all the difficulties that come with it.
We do define what we are ourselves, of course. But, since we live with others, don't the others define who we are too, in some way?
Man, it's difficult to express opinions without sounding (too) judgemental.
But, once again, believe me, it has never been my intention to criticize people for this kind of intimate things.
Peace.
5214890 I mean, I'm not kidding. It's just so well done. This could even hit the "popular stories" without sex.
5212825 UniqueSKD, though I don't contribute a lot to DeviantArt as I do on here and YouTube. I more or less do stories and animations on my YouTube channel, also the same name. Check me out some time. I'm a novice animator, but I reckon I'm doing well since I've recently hit 400+ Subs.
5215209 Well, thank you! I am quite flattered.
As far as labeling goes, that's not a bad idea. I don't really like doing it in the titles, as it can become a bit of a spoiler for the story sometimes, but perhaps a brief overview of my intent in the author's notes, or a companion blog entry or somesuch would probably not go amiss.
Hm, simple but effective, like a fine composite longbow. Well done!
5214978
Let me try and point out something here.
On the one hand we have the person such as yourself, who fits conventional gender definitions, who has a friend, acquaintance, family member, etc. who is trans or otherwise alternative gendered. That person, who has never in their life had to feel the pain of being mis-labeled, who has never had to fight to be called by the name and the pronoun they chose, that person has had no struggles, no battles, no wounds, no broken heart, no moments of hideous depression because of their gender.... you say that person does also define their friend. That that person should have a say. That person should be spared the difficult, complicated problem of calling somebody the way they choose to be called. Ooooo, so bad! So hard! So difficult! Of course we should make every effort to make that person comfortable, right?
Hah!
On the other hand we have someone who has struggled, and fought, and been mocked, and laughed at, and told that they are making nature a farce, that they are wrong, that they are horrible, that they shouldn't or don't or can't even exist. That person, who has lived with this for probably their entire life, that person, who has almost certainly struggled with depression and who is very likely to be suicidal because of what they have to deal with, that person only gets some say. That person, who has fought for who they are, that person who has had to deal with hateful slurs (which by the way, YOU yourself have used, thoughtlessly, without even considering that it was a slur, right here in my comments, but I deleted it because I do not allow slurs on this story) from everyone around them, even friends and family like our first person, who should be understanding and helpful and supportive. That person, with all those troubles, and all those problems, you just write off so lightly, because after all, other people's opinions matter too, don't they? Other people's right to never have to deal with complicated situations, other people's comfort and convenience, those obviously matter more, right? Right?
I hope you see what I'm saying here. NO, other people do not get to define you. YOU define who you are. Other people can choose to accept and support you, or they can choose to thoughtlessly dismiss you, or they can even choose to actively attack you. But they do not define you. Opinions like yours, that dismiss identities just because they're difficult or inconvenient are part of why trans and genderqueer people experience so much pain and struggle in their lives.
5216121
"That that person should have a say."
I didn't mean they - the standards - should have a say. The thing is that, for good or ill, we are all judged by our peers. Of course, some get a much harsher , undeserved judgement.
"hateful slurs (which by the way, YOU yourself have used, thoughtlessly, without even considering that it was a slur, right here in my comments, but I deleted it because I do not allow slurs on this story)"
"and told that they are making nature a farce"
Once again, I apologise for this really bad choice of words.
Though it wasn't my intention to hurt anyone, I am aware it did and am truly sorry for this.
"that they are wrong, that they are horrible, that they shouldn't or don't or can't even exist. "
I never, EVER, said or wrote or even thought that.
"I hope you see what I'm saying here."
I do.
But are you honestly still having doubts about it? You shouldn't. NO matter how untactful some of my words have been, I am nowhere as horrible as that kind of person you seem to think I am. I haven't met many transgendered, but no one has ever had to complain about my behaviour towards them.
Once again, sorry for any offense, any hurtful word I have written here.
5217035 I have no doubts that you mean well. But I also have no doubts that you have zero understanding of what it's like to be transgender. Just because you mean well doesn't prevent somebody from being hurt by your words. As they say, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
Yes, somebody has. ME, right now. I am complaining. You called Ember a tranny. You said that simply calling somebody "he" instead of "she" was against nature. Those are ignorant things to say.
I am trying to educate you, so that you'll know better than to say such things in the future. I could have just banned you and deleted your comments. I'm sure you're a nice person, but nice people can still do bad things.
5218264
"but no one has ever had to complain about my behaviour towards them."
Yes, somebody has.
I meant, not so far.
ME, right now. I am complaining. You called Ember a tranny.
What?! How can you say that, when we both know I've never, ever used this word here?
I have acknoweldged using untactful words concerning Queen/King Sweetcake, but no such a thing happened concerning Ember. Not concerning her. And, in addition, Ember's not a tranny.
Look up through all of the comments I've left here, and you'll see I've never, ever used such a sentence about any characters, fictionnal or real.
Educate me
I'd rather say "make conscious", but I'm pretty sure that making me conscious was what you had in mind.
5213279
Oh, maybe I didn't make myself clear, I'm perfectly fine with Celestia/Ember. It just takes a bit, because once I get my headcannon going, I'm pretty stubborn. So, headcannnon = Twilestia, and anything outside that has to be very well done for me to enjoy it. Just out of pure stubborness.
5222250 Okay, what did "channy" mean when you called her it, then? Because I was pretty sure you meant changeling tranny. And whatever it means, it doesn't sound like a compliment.
I wonder if Fleurs secret is that she needs Fancy Pants to even be able to have stimulating intercourse ebcause she is so internally looser than average?
5228152 I delete all slurs, as it says in the story description. That is why it doesn't show up here. I will not tolerate those kind of comments on this story.
5228446 Ah, Okay then. I'll just go ahead and delete my other comment as it's quite irrelevant now isn't it?