A human finds themselves as a voice within Pinkie's mind, only she's a young filly still on the rock farm. Aching for home, but worried what others might think, this new 'Mena' must maneuver life in Equestria. As much a life they can anyways.
After a minor magical mishap with Moon Dancer, Sunset Shimmer heads to the lounge for some tea to unwind. However, there she finds a young teacher walking down a path she once walked, giving Sunset a unique opportunity…
Five hundred years ago Celestia's neice was born. Since then Celestia has sought out proper foster parents for the unique foal. All of that has now changed. Celestia and Twilight are on their own.
This certainly was interesting. I like what you did here. I don't know if it's because of the fact that it's three in the morning and I'm half-asleep, but this really managed to catch my attention and, I must say, it was a good thing.
Well the style was pleasant. The premise... was WAY too familiar with my own story so I got the shivers. How you can really distinguish yourself is by continuing this story. It was also too short :P
I have ideas for continuations, but so far what I have written is even shorter than this in length (by more than 1000 words), and is therefore unacceptable. (After all, this is barely long enough to be a one-shot as it is.)
That was a refreshing piece; the love, devotion, regret spun into the tale makes it a fine read.
I had originally written a much longer critique, but as the story idea has been explored (which I discovered a bit too late), I'll just leave with this: One, Changelings. Two, flashbacks or backstories, when told, not shown, become a dangerous crutch. Three, be sure to mull over your ideas beforehand, to ensure there are no plot holes or OOC Syndromes requiring setups. But more importantly, mull over your ideas to ensure you are not hopping over half-buried gemstones. This was where most of my now obsolete critique went. Four, "a utopia." It's based on sound, not spelling, and this is a case of the "y" consonant (a eulogy, a university). Seems anal-retentive? That's what I first thought, too.
Five, vary your sentences. I am referring to sentence lengths and to the use of 'And' or 'But' in beginning sentences. The former might be excusable—Hemingway did fine—but the latter, not so much, please. Short sentences (like all types of sentences, whatever they were), tend to lose their power when overused. Hemingway did fine.
If you believe, however, that I perceived this story negatively based on the size of my praise versus the size of my critique, then you are wrong. Consider again the purpose. If an author is doing something right, there's little need to expound; conversely, if an author is doing something wrong, there is every need to expound and to assist. Above all else, remember that even grammar is subjective. Don't take this harshly.
Authors win ties, after all.
Please excuse me whilst I read your other stories.
Before I reply, let me thank you for your criticisms. I know I have some learning to do.
Now, for your first point... D'oh. I totally know that, but it's a knee-jerk reaction to type it without the "e". Which annoys me greatly.
Second point, I'm not intending to make a habit out of this kind of writing, it was mainly an experiment to see if I could make something out of it. Judging by the response, it seems I can.
Your third is the most bothersome to me. Would you overly mind sending a PM with some examples of plot holes, OOC syndromes, and/or buried gemstones? Your entire critique (if you still have it, that is) would be acceptable, too.
Number four... Huh. I always believed that if the word starts with a vowel, it's "an"... Thanks for pointing that out.
Five... I will keep that in mind.
In closing, I understand. Very few words are needed to express appreciation, while many are necessary to point out flaws.
This certainly was interesting. I like what you did here. I don't know if it's because of the fact that it's three in the morning and I'm half-asleep, but this really managed to catch my attention and, I must say, it was a good thing.
A pleasant read, all in all, but oh so short.
2199148
Yeah, it was just a quick idea that I'd been mulling over, and I decided to write it down. I'm glad you like it.
Well the style was pleasant. The premise... was WAY too familiar with my own story so I got the shivers. How you can really distinguish yourself is by continuing this story. It was also too short :P
3032605
I have ideas for continuations, but so far what I have written is even shorter than this in length (by more than 1000 words), and is therefore unacceptable. (After all, this is barely long enough to be a one-shot as it is.)
Perhaps someday it will be ready. But not today.
That was a refreshing piece; the love, devotion, regret spun into the tale makes it a fine read.
I had originally written a much longer critique, but as the story idea has been explored (which I discovered a bit too late), I'll just leave with this: One, Changelings. Two, flashbacks or backstories, when told, not shown, become a dangerous crutch. Three, be sure to mull over your ideas beforehand, to ensure there are no plot holes or OOC Syndromes requiring setups. But more importantly, mull over your ideas to ensure you are not hopping over half-buried gemstones. This was where most of my now obsolete critique went. Four, "a utopia." It's based on sound, not spelling, and this is a case of the "y" consonant (a eulogy, a university). Seems anal-retentive? That's what I first thought, too.
Five, vary your sentences. I am referring to sentence lengths and to the use of 'And' or 'But' in beginning sentences. The former might be excusable—Hemingway did fine—but the latter, not so much, please. Short sentences (like all types of sentences, whatever they were), tend to lose their power when overused. Hemingway did fine.
If you believe, however, that I perceived this story negatively based on the size of my praise versus the size of my critique, then you are wrong. Consider again the purpose. If an author is doing something right, there's little need to expound; conversely, if an author is doing something wrong, there is every need to expound and to assist. Above all else, remember that even grammar is subjective. Don't take this harshly.
Authors win ties, after all.
Please excuse me whilst I read your other stories.
3108163
Before I reply, let me thank you for your criticisms. I know I have some learning to do.
Now, for your first point... D'oh. I totally know that, but it's a knee-jerk reaction to type it without the "e". Which annoys me greatly.
Second point, I'm not intending to make a habit out of this kind of writing, it was mainly an experiment to see if I could make something out of it. Judging by the response, it seems I can.
Your third is the most bothersome to me. Would you overly mind sending a PM with some examples of plot holes, OOC syndromes, and/or buried gemstones? Your entire critique (if you still have it, that is) would be acceptable, too.
Number four... Huh. I always believed that if the word starts with a vowel, it's "an"... Thanks for pointing that out.
Five... I will keep that in mind.
In closing, I understand. Very few words are needed to express appreciation, while many are necessary to point out flaws.
This is a wonderful story.
Have you by any chance remembered the name of the story that inspired this? I'd like to see that
9292154
It's been years, so unfortunately not right off hand. Sorry...