Satch
Joined 16th Feb, 2012 ·
Offline
Also LikedSimilarAuthor
- Lapis-Lazuli and Stitch · 29k words · 390 13 · 4.1k views
- The Abyss · 1.5k words · 625 27 · 14k views
- Johnny_Bell · 31k words · 257 11 · 4k views
- bahatumay · 44k words · 241 13 · 4.2k views
- FauxShores · 29k words · 225 14 · 4k views
- Mariacheat-Brony · 129k words · 1,207 35 · 16k views
- Sagami · 75k words · 194 7 · 3.9k views
- ColeTrain4EVER · 14k words · 74 3 · 1.9k views
Stats
Page generated in 0.085 seconds
Total duration
859 users online
509,135 hits today, 1,996,409 yesterday
FIMFiction
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic Fanfiction
Designed and coded by knighty & Xaquseg - © 2011-2024
Follow & Support Us
Support us
SubStar
Chat!
Discord
Follow us
Twitter
MLP: Friendship is Magic® - © 2024 Hasbro Inc.®
Fimfiction is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Hasbro Inc.®
Wait, is this futa? Because the 'cumshot' 'deepthroating' and 'cum-drinking' fetish tags make me think that it is when it's between two mares. Is this so?
3947557 Nope, it's not futa. (generally avoid them due to too much crap done with them. They're currently kind of a [seal of sloppy] per se. At least haven't found a single work the past year that wasn't bland, generic or in some way kinda half-assed with them in it. And especially not one that attempted to be the least IC or balanced, all about the guy.) I would have had that in the tags then, like I have before. I just use "cum" as a unisex tag for ejaculate. And it says "female deepthroating" specifically, not male :P
And considering seemingly people's imagination in general, I seem to be the sole inventor of that on the internet... which both scares and dissapoints me to a degree... but hey! It's like the fact I seem to also have been the only one capable to imagine ("proper") equine glory holes, along with human and equine female deepthroating, along with also inventing the Spitting Cobra (opposite of Angry Dragon). Though I was thankfully not the only one to imagine clitoral nasal penetration... trailing off here xD
So yeah, to wrap it up: No, it's lesbian, like it states in the tags. I just have a fondness of using terms that literally can be used for both genders, going with the words meaning or description. Even if many only seem capable of interpreting some words for a certain gender. Such as ex: Erection, thick, limp, length, massive or etc. And I usually do it because there's literally no good terms for it for the "other" gender. Almost all "female" terms are "soft" "feeble/meek" and "sexy", and that doesn't work for quite a few of the superficial scenes I want to create, if that makes sense. Like; if I want them to ex: roughly pound their twats together, I don't want to have to write "and they sensually pressed their moist, tiny, delicate flowers against each others with more force than one would usually apply!"... (or vice versa if actually wanting a more intimate m/m moment) makes sense?
3956838 Well I consider deepthroating, you know, pushing a dick deep into a mare's (or stallion's if that's what you're into) throat. Kinda the whole reason behind the term being called that.
And with that little comment, I will fuck off into whatever counts as the sunset around here. Won't downvote ya, but I sure as hell ain't stickin' around. Later~
3958034 That is the basic, male version of it. Though hum... contemplating the specific terms used, mainly that it's supposed to go deep into the throat, you did have me doubt the use of "deepthroat" for the female version... it's the same principle used of stuffing sex down throat, but it doesn't go very deep, mainly just past the uvula... hm, I think I gotta find a more fitting terms for it. This has actually been helpful, so thanks xP
And haha, fair enough ;P But hey; Least I tag my shit correctly. Or well, as close as I can considering some things have no words... still, it's better than those that don't tag at all or just blatantly lie about the content. Though, dunno if you read it or not, but sorry if you got mislead and did, as that is the exact reason I use my tag system to avoid.
3959058 Glad to be of assistance.
And no, I didn't read it. Sometimes, with stories like this where I leave a comment asking about the basic gist of the story, I just wait for the author to reply before I start reading.
3960392 Okies, glad to hear. As said: It's what I have the content info there for xP
And heh, I do the same thing. Been lied to a couple times though, which is bad form imo...
3966381 Well at least you take your experience and use that in your own stories so others don't have to go through what you did at the time. Tiny things really, but still helpful. Keep it classy, bro~
3966570 Yeah... sadly if feels like I'm one of the few that actually strive to improve... and like a swedish saying: "Small streams make great rivers". I implemented the "content" system for two main reasons: 1: I wanted as said to be able to inform people of what they were about to read, to ensure they didn't "waste their time" per se. (find it extra bad form to downvote something that actually bothers to inform it's content... kinda like hating ex: pie, then go and eat pie at a place that puts a ton of effort into their home made pies, just to whine that you don't like pie... then don't go fucking eat it you fucktard! (sorry, just ticked on douche-bags and hypocrites, dealt with far too many lately)
2: I've read far to many awful fics that doesn't even write what they contain, OR lie about it. Like one I read that I was promised (AFTER asking the author like you did with me) a "romantic story, with IC and "serious" themes", what I got was a bland piece of one sided cock worship with cardboard cut-outs, oh and it was also hyper penises in it. Heck, found it so bad I even "translated" it to see if people actually liked anything in it, or if it was just the blatant pandering and cock worship that lured people. Seen a ton of "plot convenience" stories too. Though, one that takes the price did a "I don't want to come off as sexist or generic, so I've removed anything that might be considered empowering to females, or feministic, and instead replaced it with inoffensive patriarchal norms and masculine stereotypes." because you know, making sense... seen far too many fics that wouldn't hold up on their own if it wasn't for the fact they blindly followed the norm to be the equivalent of a "popcorn movie".
Feh... still, my most hated fic+comic/folio will prolly always be the one that was pay to view (cept I acquired it by other means, to check out first) and it was promoted as a "lesbian" folio with lots of "mare action", literally the only female content was the previews... rest was just gay anal sex and dick sucking, and guys showing off their cocks... like, sure, I'm all for that as a whole, but don't advertise something as something else just to get more views/be more popular! Hate when someone ex; R63 a mane six, solely so they can use a male in their story, yet claim "hey look, it's x!" despite not even writing them close to that character, basically being their self-insert, but disguised for promotional purposes... went on a tangent, sorry xD For some reason really worked up today... dunno if you heard of it, but the "hooves and holly" folio pulled a similar scam. Was severely half-assed, and just a cover for a "futafolio 2:0" as most call it. Like heck, most barely put any effort into the "original" content, only doing a hap-hazard scribble, then putting all effort into their "alt version", which was their "original" plan for it. If it wasn't for the fact I got a copy without paying to review it, I'd honestly have demanded a refund, or some sort of compensation. Welp, cutting it here before I ramble further, sorry xD
Though some people would get confused with the terminology; you'd think they wouldn't go off and dislike it just because they decided not to read the description... [+1]'d
4079871 It's at least not that many tbh.
And yeah, it does seem like most don't read the description.
And hum, was reminded that I still technically plan to do the other chapter/s of this.