Now that everyone in Ponyville Elementary has finally gotten their cutie marks and reached legal maturity, Princess Cadance can come and give them a hooves-on education about some of her favorite topics.
Page generated in 0.053 seconds
Total duration
1,067 users online
1,403,984 hits today, 1,960,719 yesterday
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic Fanfiction
Designed and coded by knighty & Xaquseg - © 2011-2024
Support us
SubStar
Chat!
Discord
Follow us
Twitter
MLP: Friendship is Magic® - © 2024 Hasbro Inc.®
Fimfiction is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Hasbro Inc.®
I'll be in my bunk.
another new chapter?! pinch me i must be dreaming!
Woah! Another chapter? Calm down man you're going WAY to fast!
The Romans were way too kinky to have only one word for a blowjob.
7956192
7956204
My Patreon supporters, ask, I deliver.
7956164
Okay, Jayne.
7956288
Yeah... I think I'll skip that lesson.
I'm sure it's somebody's fetish, but it's definitely not mine.
7956299
The term's applicable to any sort of face fucking. The description you quoted was just a particular Roman cultural... let's go with quirk.
Not my thing, but a decent chapter. Plus it's cute to see a little young love forming.
On a more critical note, you slip into first person at least twice:
7956351
Ugh, and here I thought I'd caught them all.
*fixes*
Yeah... for some reason, I really wanted to slip into first person while writing this. I caught a lot more of these before I published it.
7956415
Well, I see somebody has a thing for milfs.
Cadance is one hell of a good teacher.. as you'd expect. just it's really awesome how you can make this both so educational, so deliberate, so good at just being a lesson, and still really really fucking hot. Cadance is definitely enjoying this, but she's being very professional about it, it just makes everything work so much better, grounds it more and so the sex stands out as all the hotter for feeling more natural.
Also... awesome job on forcing them to get out of their comfort zone and branch out to other ponies, keep them from just picking one partner to do all this with and try to keep them experimenting, while being there to help if they need it.
I remember my first time learning about this...... We were watching a video on how its done and my friend wanted to ask a question and.... My teacher paused the video at the exact time when they were doing it.... Yep.... My friend fell off of her chair and nearly dragged me down with her. No one was looking at the screen anymore... ALSO the video was a cartoon AND ALSO This story is actually teaching me a few things ;)
7956639 nonononononono, it's not that, and he really is not one. And that is not why. it's because he's such an entitled, self centered, obnoxious, useless, douchebag that he's just so damn punchable.
Granted I did love him as a character, it's great seeing ponies trying to deal with his doucheyness... but having to deal with him IRL, yeah that would not go well or be fun. You at least toned down that aspect and it was more just a reason he was so desperate to do this.
Also, really looking forward to that payoff of the Chekhov's Futaloo.
And other note, love just the whole attitude you have ponies having about this. Not libido driven uber sluts that will fuck anything just for the sake of making some clop, not ramping up the sex drive, but simply.. lacking the social taboos and inhibitions we do about sex. The foals are just kind of hesitant and unsure, simply because it's new, but still treat it just like something normal... and a filly going around telling stallions she wants their cock is met with more a "Wait.. WHAT!?" about her being so brazen then some huge scandal. Just, love the attitude you nailed making it so much more realistic and feel so much better because of the work they put into it.
Oh...ohhhhh.. I just had a bad thought..... how much of her homework is Diamond Tiara pushing off on her butler to do for her?
7956671 I wasn't talking about Zepher (Is that how you spell it?)! You understood me wrong, I men't that I remember when I learned about "it" ;) for the first time in school in real life! XD
Also I read this because I cant find any good Soarindash stories..... I read them all :3
I always wonder how they are so eager to do it and I am so eager to quit life if I had to do it with my teacher, friend or anyone to be honest
Really? I'd say the most important part of a blowjob is not letting your teeth come in contact with you're unfortunate boyfriend's precious organ.
hum ok ware can I get signed up for his class?
I grate chapter.
O teacher I may need so extra study time.
Hurray for more chapters!
7956639
Sounds like your sex ed class was almost as fun as Cadance's...
7956671
Yeah, I do enjoy me some worlds where sex isn't taboo. ^.^ I assume you've read How to Take Care of Your Mare? I think I remember you commenting on that one...
(And DT making her poor butler do this for her! )
7956745
I guess it's a bit subjective.
But personally, I'd rather have a girl who accidentally uses too much teeth than one who obviously doesn't want to be doing it.
7956753
Just send a note to the Equestrian School Board when all the colts and fillies in your class have their cutie marks.
7956760
Thank my Patreon supporters.
Well that chapter was hotdorable
7956738 Oops, meant to reply to the comment below yours, clicked on the wrong one, my bad.
Though as to your reply... it likely helps when your teacher for this, is the closest thing to a literal Love Goddess your world has.
Awe cute!
7956841
7957462
I try.
So... I hate to bring in politics into what should be a mindless clop, but are you one of those who thinks biological sex and chromosomes are a social construct, or did I misread?
Well I generally don't have to pretend, but alright.
7957601
7957526
Yes, you definitely misread.
Biological sex and chromosomes are obviously just biological facts.
(And you should be aware that there are more than just two options for each, not even counting surgical alterations. There are people who are born with unusual combinations of genitalia, and in addition to XX and XY there are people who are born with X, XXY, XYY, XXX, XXXY, XXXXY, and XXYY chromosomes.)
Gender, on the other hand, is a social construct.
7957649 So... I didn't misread. Besides the 32 genders thing being the invention of narcissists in gender studies courses, those other chromosome combinations usually result in death, because that's just not how humans are designed to be. We have 2 sexes. That's it.
As a man I'm OK with reading about oral sex in the real life I find even it's tough to be disgusting meanwhile I would happily try out how it feels when a girl pegging me.
7956795
+1 for tabooless sex. Not enough of that out there, esp kinky settings.
7957743
Well, no. Human beings have a living chromosome. Currently, the male XY chromosome set is evolving toward XO. XXY and XXX are also often stable, although they still have a higher risk for issues. Sexual reproduction is binary, barring development of some interesting new techniques, but phenotype and genotype has a very small non binary viable set that produce those two gametes.
Gender, on the other hand, is a social performance the same way blackness often is. (e.g. wiggers) I doubt there's only 32 of those, any more than there's only 32 ways to "be black." Just look at, say, the differences in "metrosexuals" and "betas" as they define themselves. These are both distinct ways that men define what their maleness is, and what maleness is to them. It's hard to say one or the other is objectively right, especially exclusively right, in any testable way. I know I have preferences, though.
7958623 Except they are still male in both mind and body. Studies have been shown that the overwhelming majority of males identify with mostly masculine behaviors, and the same is true for females and feminine behaviors. However, the person who conducted the study didn't like these findings and so warped them to say that because there were very few men who identified 100% with masculine characteristics, then biology plays no factor and gender is purely a social construct. That's what I meant by a product of narcissists in gender studies courses. As for the specific number of genders made up by people who just want to feel special in an age of instant gratification, that number fluctuates daily as they're constantly being made up by people in need of outside validation.
7958794
What's an objectively masculine behavior? What you're saying is technically true intraculturally, but applying it interculturally isn't right. That may be where you're seeing the study as warped.
Here's my only issue. Why is oral intercourse after getting laid?
7957853
No soundproofing spell. ^.^ No need for it without such intense taboos.
7959079
Because Cadance sees it as more intimate or more difficult.
7957743
They usually result in infertility.
But every combination I mentioned has been seen in living humans. Some of them are as common as 1 in 1000.
Implying that humans were designed. They weren't.
Objectively untrue.
Combinations other than the usual two are rare, but they exist.
7958794
Just because the overwhelming majority is one way doesn't mean that other ways don't exist.
I'm not saying that non-binary genders are common, but to deny their existence entirely is to bury your head in the sand.
Hooray! You've figured it out!
You might want to consider for a moment the possibility that people who make a career out of gender studies actually know more about gender than you do.
What credentials of expertise do you bring to the discussion?
7958623
Well said. ^.^
oh my gosh!
7959885
that was hot
New love in bloom. It's beautiful. Also I think I found my new favorite ship.
Taking wild guess, but I pretty sure that in next chapter Diamond Tiara will suck a dick. She will like it. But refuse to admit it. Just for comedy in story.
7959750
Well even scientists of world can't ruled that out.
Fist of all they didn't find the "lost link" of evolution.(link between humans and apes.) Which leaves too much room for speculation.(annoying,but true )
Second, we humans the only species that have significant part of genome not native. (Bring via viruses )
In both my arguments I not sure, because that info is 7 years old.
Correct me somebody /somepony if I am wrong. I would like to know the newest opinion of scientists on that matter.
7958852 Been a while since I read it. It was something to the effect of if a guy embodied every masculine stereotype, but also liked sitting at the opera, then he didn't really identify as male and was categorized as ambiguous.
7959736
That makes sense.
7959750 It sounds like you're suggesting that the existence of a population that doesn't even amount to an entire percent somehow invalidates everyone else, that because some women enjoy traditionally masculine activities that it somehow means there isn't a biological inclination. A guy who likes to work out but also knits isn't some new gender. He's just a guy. If he has dissociative identity disorder where the chemical makeup of his brain is more in line with being female, and then he goes through surgery, I have no problem referring to her as such.
These people who identify as these made up genders are overwhelmingly college students who grew up being told that they were special just for being. They grew up and found that there were millions of others just as special as them, making them feel less special about all their non-accomplishments. And in the internet age where more and more people are becoming accustomed to instant gratification and the validation of strangers, how do they feel special? They make stuff up. They compete in oppression olympics. They sexually identify as animals and then start screaming if you don't applaud them. They make safe spaces where they don't have to listen to different opinions, like the existence of biology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XsMcScapeQ These are the credentials of gender studies courses. Brainwashing students into believing that everything is bigotry. They're basically a cult.
I will concede that "design" was not the best term. However, there is a clear genetic blueprint for how a healthy human is meant to be.
7960771
The current consensus is that the evidence strongly matches evolution over intelligent design, at least on the human species level. AFAIK the drift in our junk dna matches the expectations of evolution relative to the other primates, for example. There's probably better examples out there though.
7961406
eah, that's dumb. Male to some place in America might be orthogonal to male in some place in Africa, but there's certainly some gender neutral things and even wiggle room for mixed presentations.
7960709
Nah, I've got something in mind that's much more ... fucked up.
7960771
Yes they have. Ask any evolutionary biologist -- the type of scientist who specializes in that field.
Annoying and untrue.
Tell me, what would this 'missing link' look like?
Complete bunk. I have no idea where you found that.
(And I have no idea how viral DNA is supposed to prove we were 'designed'.)
Well do a little research, eh?
Done.
7962554 Never doubt that. And looking forward to that.
7961448
And this is why you're somehow feeling attacked by non-binary genders and sexes?
The fact that there are other things out there besides just basic male and female doesn't 'invalidate' male and female.
If you want to call yourself simply male or female, go ahead. You don't need to deny the very existence of others in order to do so.
Nobody (except maybe your half-remembered study) is claiming this.
Even if true ... so what?
Let them have their pity party if that's what they want.
You really expect us to watch an hour and a half of this?
I'm sure some do go overboard.
But then you're here, claiming that they don't even exist, so...
So we go from 'designed' to 'meant'...
not a lot of progress there.
You're still ascribing intentionality to a random process.
(And also implying that 'different = wrong' ... just moments after you accuse those who are different of seeing bigotry that isn't there.)
7962572 No. I'm feeling threatened when this sort of thing is being used as an excuse to teach children how to be sexual in grade school. How else are children supposed to learn what gender is (before they can even read) if so-called professionals don't take the time to tell them in explicit detail. I also feel threatened when these ideologues start demanding punishments be inflicted for failure to use their made up pronouns. Not to mention all the efforts to take the science out of science in schools because they're not PC enough https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiLtNc_GWhM Or that the obsession with equality of outcome is trumping the equality of opportunity.
Except of course for the narcissists in gender studies courses.
I see no reason to encourage unhealthy behavior, physical or mental, let alone have it taught and celebrated in universities. This is what is increasingly typical of a gender studies student https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiOYZWtV2FI
No. The first couple segments are sufficient. There's also a list of links, the last one arguing that we need to abandon facts in favor of emotion. All of these display the level of brainwashing at work.
We can all agree that a human born without legs was not born right. Humans are supposed to have exactly two legs that follow a certain shape. We can tell this by not only looking at the overwhelming majority, but also using modern science to tell us that these anomalies are often the result of an unfortunate genetic disorder. Evolution is real, a constantly changing design to ensure that life has the best odds of survival. However, that doesn't change the fact that our genetics carry in them a code for how humans are meant to be. The code might essentially be written in improv over the last couple billion years, but there's a reason we're able to distinguish a human from any other life on sight.
Oh, and I do believe this is the woman who made the study, saying the only reason anyone would even want to find a difference between males and females is to justify discrimination, and that violence is inherently male https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cmg4fV5mAKs
7962572 On second thought, nevermind. I wrote these because you kind of touched on one of my pet pieves, but now it's hopefully out of my system. Any chance we can agree on a virtual handshake and part on amicable terms?
7962720
I think that the root of the problem here is that SJW reactionism is mixing facts with crazy. Yes, there are some nutso SJW out there, but to the extent that I have observed it's much less common, and held much less credible, than the reaction to it. I think we can all agree that some things are cultural, such as assigning pink to boys and blue to girls as was once done. Other things are biological, such as gametosis. The problem here is that when the question: "what does this mean for society at large?" comes up, then people get ideological and shift terms until reasonable discourse becomes impossible.
Things like white privilege and male privilege exist. We can and have tested for them and even determined dollar values for them at the statistical level at least. When someone confounds this with, say, wanting to deny a specific white male college admission in favor of a specific black female as an end in and of itself then the point has been very certainly missed.
At the genetic level, the only relevant generalizable difference is that deaths of large portions of the population not occur to individuals capable of bearing the child and of breeding age. Everything else wrt social structure is social, even though it may not be obvious or easy to pin down. And when someone, even a fucked up someone, asks for something like a made up pronoun it's a legitimate conversation to have- If we should respect and use legal force for the 'n' word (which we do) then should we do the same of everyone else's words? Why do we give this respect to racial slurs, what's the outcome if we don't, and do these same outcomes happen with other words? I've seen and been in situations where using the wrong pronoun is just as consequential as using the 'n' word at a Klan rally. That's why I personally think everyone should respect each other no matter how fucked up it is. It's not my place to care how other people are living their lives.
Finally, personal pet peeve of mine here in saying that the liberals/progressives/whatever are sexualizing our children. I grew up in an extremely repressive conservative environment and there was exactly as much fucking as you hear about from hippy dippy schools. Hell, it was the liberals who pushed the age of consent up from 12 in the first place. That issue has exactly nothing to do about anything or anyone. It only exists as a roundabout way to call people you disagree with child molesters. I'm not saying you specifically are trying to use it that way, I'm saying that's where it came from to start with.
7964009 Blue was assigned to girls? I knew pink was considered boyish because red was deemed masculine and pink was considered an almost-red, but I never knew that about blue.
So when men are more likely than women to be arrested, charged, and go to prison, that's men keeping women down? When you say dollar values, I'm assuming you mean the often debunked wage gap? http://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/04/12/dont-buy-into-the-gender-pay-gap-myth/#185e06a74766 And how is it that white privilege ensures that the leading demographic in jobs and test scores are Asians? http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/07/the_myth_of_white_privilege.html Other factors, such as rampant fatherlessness in black communities resulting from black women marrying the state, or the biological inclination of women to go into less competitive fields, account for this so-called discrimination. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut2VVAW0MwM
We shouldn't be using force on anyone for any words. Banning words is the first step to banning thoughts. That's the whole premise of college safe spaces, to protect the fragile feelings of SJWs from unpopular ideas.
When I see a young boy dressed as a slutty girl in the name of being tolerant to gays, or Salon saying it's okay to be a pedophile, I call that a serious issue.
7964121
I may be wrong about blue, but that is how I was taught it.
The wage gap is an example, but I was also talking about things such as redlining in the 60's, which had a measurable real dollar cost in terms of higher interest rates and less favorable loan terms as well as direct government subsidies. Those tend to be less counter-rationalized than the pay gap. But even the "debunking" of the pay gap isn't pointing to genetic code. It's shifting the blame, probably fairly, away from the social institution of middle management and to other social institutions re: "That statistic doesn’t take into account a lot of choices that women and men make—education, years of experience and hours worked—that influence earnings." But here we're again doing slight of hand to support the narrative. Social expectations and opportunities that are rooted in elementary school are being presented solely as personal preference. While that may be true for any given individual, it's *not* true at the statistical level.
Also, we should remember that even the privileged experience discrimination. Almost everyone has both privileges and discrimination in their lives. Examples of privileged people being discriminated against and discriminated people having privileges doesn't mean that privilege and discrimination doesn't happen. It just defines its shape.
I can't agree with you about using force for words as a principle. There are real life consequences for using words a certain way, such as yelling fire in a crowded theater. We cannot secure liberty or the general welfare without recognizing that fact.
As for the last thing, do you feel the same way when a religious family dresses their kid like a Puratain, or forbids their daughter from cutting her hair? What about if she's dressed up in Hijab? These are all equally abusive behaviors, but they differ in cultural bias.