Pony aliens have come to Earth, and a particularly friendly one has moved in next to George. But why does she keep calling him Anon and want to have sex with him so badly? Human on pony action, public sex, and a threesome with the coltfriend ensue.
11099176 TBH, it was the comedy. I'm enjoying the awkward corruption of George and the general weirdness he is dealing with. This chapter had some pretty funny moments. Although, the drugs, threesome, and buttsecks didn't hurt. lol.
11100519 The ponies have guitars and have an understanding of rock music. In the episode where Rainbow Dash does the Sonic Rainboom to save Rarity and several Wonderbolts, Rarity says she doesn't like rock music. In another episode, even though it's done as a joke, Rarity shreds on an acoustic guitar in a heavy metal riff.
EDIT: You could have George and Banana and Glitter sitting around one of their apartments listening to the various music from their worlds. They could comment on how music like country, rock, metal, rap, electronica, etc.. sounds very similar.
11149230 That's probably also why the world "consider" originally meant to "observe the stars," because answers were thought to be understood through reading constellations. I'm sure there were words or phrases that also defined the one and only landmass where people were before people sailed west and found another surprise group of sapient beings. I think our observation, once again, just takes us halfway across the Atlantic ocean. And somehow, so very soon after, we are prey to a confidence that it is all water. 300 million habitable zone planets out there. If we sailed to 300 million more continents on earth, do you they would all be deserts? That's a very big number. We may one day think that the very word we use to denote advanced intelligence is based on one of the dumbest assumptions we have ever made. To me, it challenges whether we deserve the title.
As hot as the premise is, I can't get past how all comparisons between humans and ponies end up with humans being inferior. Like, I'm not buying that a mare would ever want to touch men if stallions are so much superior in every way.
11305331 I think if a culture is a lot more sexually liberal and accepting, it leads to a higher standard of competition. Its kind of realistic that way. If more people do something, it creates stronger market competition. Ponies in this story are vastly more experienced and openly supportive of sex in comparison to humans. Its kind of inevitable that the average stallion is going to be good at it. I mean think of comparing a stripper with a religious conservative. In general, the experience with the stripper will be far more memorable. I think in this equestria, even the conservative ones are more adept than more experienced humans. Its less about a racial or gender superiority than a society that lends itself to rapid growth in specific talents. Being better is inevitable due to experience and competition. It would seem quite unrealistic if ponies with that system were somehow inferior to a system with little competition and drive for progress in sexual ability in general. So I'd say the desire for human interaction is less inspired by a wanting for sexual competence but a desire for unique interaction beyond general competence.
I think if a culture is a lot more sexually liberal and accepting, it leads to a higher standard of competition.
What competition? Ponies fuck everything that moves in this story. Realistically, they would be far worse at sex than humans who are highly selective about it and favor superior sexual prowess.
Its less about a racial or gender superiority than a society that lends itself to rapid growth in specific talents. So I'd say the desire for human interaction is less inspired by a wanting for sexual competence but a desire for unique interaction beyond general competence.
What's unique about humans here? They have smaller dicks, worse pussies, worse asses, worse tongues, worse throats, less stamina, no magic, no wings, somehow even hands are worse than hooves and they are weaker. Ponies are portrayed as a superior species in every way, and yet Banana says she likes George just as much if not more so than her coltfriend. If someone offered you 100$ or 1000000$, who would ever pick the first?
11309135 So I wonder why people have relationships with someone who is handicapped? Would the dollar value of a person in a wheelchair be automatically less to you? I think in my experience of real-world relationships, including my own, sexual function was actually never the main draw.
Part of the story's inspiration was actually my real-life experiences with a former person I knew. She was majorly more than I could handle. It actually made the relationship undesirable for me. So those awkward feelings of George feeling a bit overwhelmed but still rolling with it, were kind of from my personal experience. It diverges though from that to being a more considerate relationship. George isn't only a tool. When I commissioned it I was thinking of George being in this kind of attraction that was fascinating but persistently on the edge of overwhelming. I've been there and I passed on it irl. My current wife of 9 years came up with the name George. I am so much happier with my current wife and this is a far more enduring relationship. I don't really want people to come away from this story thinking that sexual performance is everything in a good relationship. I don't even want them to think it's even much of a factor at all. In fact, I don't remember if the story even mentions how good George's ex was. Perhaps she was even a better performer than Banana Paradise. Who knows. It's all Crimson's writing magic that makes this so fantastic. I was kind of hoping the sex would be desirable but also intimidating. Kind of like an extreme amusement ride. Having an exciting element of fear to it. I don't actually like the really extreme rollercoasters myself, but I get why it's exciting. But I kind of hoped some readers would come out actually happier that their relationship isn't so kinky or wild. Most people I think just want to feel like a normal life a little bit. It's good for fiction to fill the fantasies that people would maybe rather not have in real life. But like to entertain from a distance.
So I wonder why people have relationships with someone who is handicapped? Would the dollar value of a person in a wheelchair be automatically less to you?
As one of the blind members of this site, I think I'm pretty qualified to answer this question. For a lot of people, yes our dollar value is less and we get avoided for a lot of different reasons. I think the biggest reason is that many people feel that it's twice as complicated as a standard relationship. Not only do they have to dance around the normal relationship land mines, they feel they have to be extra careful not to offend about the persons handicap. Were considered twice the work and too much trouble. Which is sad because we really aren't easily offended at all. We've heard it all before and often from extremely nasty and offensive people, so an accidental slip by someone were dating doesn't even get noticed. We're not as emotionally fragile as people think.
Monk “Did we do something wrong?” “Nah,” said the other stallion, sounding more use to this reaction. “She’ll be fine. Some humans get post-orgasmic guilt and have to go do something called a ‘confession’ to feel better.” -Crimson Prose
11362983 You are absolutely qualified to answer that question.
I like how you emphasize 'dollar' value here. You recognize value is an immensely if not eternally facet system with people and dollar is just one of them. The generally extremely progressive thoughts that people have can often feel confident in boxing people's abilities in a list of limited enumerations and feel they have it all defined. I'm more cautious about that. Like say, neo-agrarian Aldo Leopold, I can sit in a forest and learn immense value from everything around me. With humans, it's much easier. I found Time Waster's comment that humans are inferior and unappealing just because of one function in one area compared to another just so monumentally offensive to me because it just boxes people into such a reduced set of traits. As if all species can just be ranked and filed away. When a person like Aldo can call birds in flight a 'feathered navy' and some people oversimplify the complexity of a human to the angle and thrust of their anatomy just undersells people way too much to stay quiet about. That's fine what other people think if they can't see why a squirrel has value next to a dog but I will never agree with such rationale. I suppose if people are only able to see value in terms of what is best, they won't be able to appreciate many stories. Such as To Kill a Mockingbird. Devaluing people next to others seems to be a very enduring trait.
However, I don't know why someone would thumb down his comment. Even if an opinion triggers me somehow, I find it very engaging and interesting to see how others think. So I actually thumbed it up. People have different experiences and different thoughts. In the combination of them we will grow wiser. Perhaps he has a point I'm not getting and attraction really can be conveyed in ways that make it clear and obvious to readers, even if such a notion is completely inconsistent with my observation of real-life experiences in my approximately 40 years of life. Who knows. Either way, I don't feel you or Time Waster have at all wasted my time. Otherwise, I wouldn't type a letter.
I would have replied sooner but I haven't looked at stories for a few months.
Lmao
This was on my "tracked". This chapter put it on my favorites.
Oh. Oh, dear...
11098659
Please see a doctor if your ass is falling off when you laugh
11098707
Glad you liked the threesome and/or buttsecks and/or drugs.
11098725
There are no deer in this story.
There's sex, there's drugs(or a drug analogue),now we just need rock-n-roll.
11099176
TBH, it was the comedy. I'm enjoying the awkward corruption of George and the general weirdness he is dealing with. This chapter had some pretty funny moments. Although, the drugs, threesome, and buttsecks didn't hurt. lol.
LOL... poor dude just got Shanghaied into a wedding
11099517
No I'm pretty sure it was just drugs and not an analog
I'm not entirely sure how to put rock in there though!
11099742
The buttsecks might have hurt without the drugs, but combined they didn't.
11100160
Yes such an unfortunate guy
11100519
The ponies have guitars and have an understanding of rock music. In the episode where Rainbow Dash does the Sonic Rainboom to save Rarity and several Wonderbolts, Rarity says she doesn't like rock music. In another episode, even though it's done as a joke, Rarity shreds on an acoustic guitar in a heavy metal riff.
EDIT: You could have George and Banana and Glitter sitting around one of their apartments listening to the various music from their worlds. They could comment on how music like country, rock, metal, rap, electronica, etc.. sounds very similar.
11100525
There, I tweaked the strip show so that the music was 'heavy rock', now it has all three.
11100630
Heavy rock is what heavy metal used to be called before 1968-ish.
Somebody touch the NUT button!
A LOT.
'Cause I pushed mine too much.
11114378
I'm glad that your nut button is getting an adequate workout
11149230
That's probably also why the world "consider" originally meant to "observe the stars," because answers were thought to be understood through reading constellations. I'm sure there were words or phrases that also defined the one and only landmass where people were before people sailed west and found another surprise group of sapient beings. I think our observation, once again, just takes us halfway across the Atlantic ocean. And somehow, so very soon after, we are prey to a confidence that it is all water. 300 million habitable zone planets out there. If we sailed to 300 million more continents on earth, do you they would all be deserts? That's a very big number. We may one day think that the very word we use to denote advanced intelligence is based on one of the dumbest assumptions we have ever made. To me, it challenges whether we deserve the title.
hope this story will be updated sometime [fairly] soon please!
11185528
Extremely sorry for the lateness on these things. I hope to be getting things started back soon.
As hot as the premise is, I can't get past how all comparisons between humans and ponies end up with humans being inferior. Like, I'm not buying that a mare would ever want to touch men if stallions are so much superior in every way.
11305331
I think if a culture is a lot more sexually liberal and accepting, it leads to a higher standard of competition. Its kind of realistic that way. If more people do something, it creates stronger market competition. Ponies in this story are vastly more experienced and openly supportive of sex in comparison to humans. Its kind of inevitable that the average stallion is going to be good at it. I mean think of comparing a stripper with a religious conservative. In general, the experience with the stripper will be far more memorable. I think in this equestria, even the conservative ones are more adept than more experienced humans. Its less about a racial or gender superiority than a society that lends itself to rapid growth in specific talents. Being better is inevitable due to experience and competition. It would seem quite unrealistic if ponies with that system were somehow inferior to a system with little competition and drive for progress in sexual ability in general. So I'd say the desire for human interaction is less inspired by a wanting for sexual competence but a desire for unique interaction beyond general competence.
11309089
What competition? Ponies fuck everything that moves in this story. Realistically, they would be far worse at sex than humans who are highly selective about it and favor superior sexual prowess.
What's unique about humans here? They have smaller dicks, worse pussies, worse asses, worse tongues, worse throats, less stamina, no magic, no wings, somehow even hands are worse than hooves and they are weaker. Ponies are portrayed as a superior species in every way, and yet Banana says she likes George just as much if not more so than her coltfriend. If someone offered you 100$ or 1000000$, who would ever pick the first?
11309135
So I wonder why people have relationships with someone who is handicapped? Would the dollar value of a person in a wheelchair be automatically less to you? I think in my experience of real-world relationships, including my own, sexual function was actually never the main draw.
Part of the story's inspiration was actually my real-life experiences with a former person I knew. She was majorly more than I could handle. It actually made the relationship undesirable for me. So those awkward feelings of George feeling a bit overwhelmed but still rolling with it, were kind of from my personal experience. It diverges though from that to being a more considerate relationship. George isn't only a tool. When I commissioned it I was thinking of George being in this kind of attraction that was fascinating but persistently on the edge of overwhelming. I've been there and I passed on it irl. My current wife of 9 years came up with the name George. I am so much happier with my current wife and this is a far more enduring relationship. I don't really want people to come away from this story thinking that sexual performance is everything in a good relationship. I don't even want them to think it's even much of a factor at all. In fact, I don't remember if the story even mentions how good George's ex was. Perhaps she was even a better performer than Banana Paradise. Who knows. It's all Crimson's writing magic that makes this so fantastic. I was kind of hoping the sex would be desirable but also intimidating. Kind of like an extreme amusement ride. Having an exciting element of fear to it. I don't actually like the really extreme rollercoasters myself, but I get why it's exciting. But I kind of hoped some readers would come out actually happier that their relationship isn't so kinky or wild. Most people I think just want to feel like a normal life a little bit. It's good for fiction to fill the fantasies that people would maybe rather not have in real life. But like to entertain from a distance.
11309588
As one of the blind members of this site, I think I'm pretty qualified to answer this question. For a lot of people, yes our dollar value is less and we get avoided for a lot of different reasons. I think the biggest reason is that many people feel that it's twice as complicated as a standard relationship. Not only do they have to dance around the normal relationship land mines, they feel they have to be extra careful not to offend about the persons handicap. Were considered twice the work and too much trouble. Which is sad because we really aren't easily offended at all. We've heard it all before and often from extremely nasty and offensive people, so an accidental slip by someone were dating doesn't even get noticed. We're not as emotionally fragile as people think.
Monk
“Did we do something wrong?” “Nah,” said the other stallion, sounding more use to this reaction. “She’ll be fine. Some humans get post-orgasmic guilt and have to go do something called a ‘confession’ to feel better.” -Crimson Prose
11362983
You are absolutely qualified to answer that question.
I like how you emphasize 'dollar' value here. You recognize value is an immensely if not eternally facet system with people and dollar is just one of them. The generally extremely progressive thoughts that people have can often feel confident in boxing people's abilities in a list of limited enumerations and feel they have it all defined. I'm more cautious about that. Like say, neo-agrarian Aldo Leopold, I can sit in a forest and learn immense value from everything around me. With humans, it's much easier. I found Time Waster's comment that humans are inferior and unappealing just because of one function in one area compared to another just so monumentally offensive to me because it just boxes people into such a reduced set of traits. As if all species can just be ranked and filed away. When a person like Aldo can call birds in flight a 'feathered navy' and some people oversimplify the complexity of a human to the angle and thrust of their anatomy just undersells people way too much to stay quiet about. That's fine what other people think if they can't see why a squirrel has value next to a dog but I will never agree with such rationale. I suppose if people are only able to see value in terms of what is best, they won't be able to appreciate many stories. Such as To Kill a Mockingbird. Devaluing people next to others seems to be a very enduring trait.
However, I don't know why someone would thumb down his comment. Even if an opinion triggers me somehow, I find it very engaging and interesting to see how others think. So I actually thumbed it up. People have different experiences and different thoughts. In the combination of them we will grow wiser. Perhaps he has a point I'm not getting and attraction really can be conveyed in ways that make it clear and obvious to readers, even if such a notion is completely inconsistent with my observation of real-life experiences in my approximately 40 years of life. Who knows. Either way, I don't feel you or Time Waster have at all wasted my time. Otherwise, I wouldn't type a letter.
I would have replied sooner but I haven't looked at stories for a few months.
This was already weird and then it took an even weirder turn, and I'm ok with it.
11681056
That's a good mentality to have with my work.