• Member Since 29th Jul, 2012
  • offline last seen Wednesday

Learn for Life


More Blog Posts116

  • 14 weeks
    A Picture of My First-Ever OC(s)

    Drawn by Drokmars, whose work is mainly NSFW, so click at your own discretion.

    Read More

    1 comments · 87 views
  • 63 weeks
    Knowing Nothing, and Starting Over

    For the past year and a half, I have been attempting to learn Chess. I started out at 100 ELO, which is to say I started out at the very bottom. I couldn't beat anybody for the first few weeks, and before this, I had never won against anyone in my life, not even a computer. After I finally understood enough to know how to win, I started winning one game out of every five.

    Read More

    1 comments · 195 views
  • 169 weeks
    A Review of Emily Spahn's "Pierside"

    Good Lord, is this overdue.

    Read More

    0 comments · 270 views
  • 170 weeks
    Fighting To Write, So Far Victorious

    I had not posted anything since the year started, but this does not mean that I have not been writing. Indeed, I had taken bookplayer's and First_Down's advice and looking at Jim Butcher's blogs, and attempting to stick with one of his recommendations: write. The only way that I am going to improve is to write.

    Read More

    2 comments · 222 views
  • 212 weeks
    Had Way Too Much Fun in Paint Today



    Read More

    4 comments · 288 views
Feb
8th
2014

A Theory on Writing: The Relationship Between Character, Setting, and Conflict · 5:51pm Feb 8th, 2014

Well-told stories entertain, first and foremost; once this is accomplished, they have the power to speak to the human condition(i). After all, stories are human creations that are composed of elements that represent our reality. Characters are our selves and consciousness, settings are our surroundings and situations, and plots are not necessarily challenges, but rather incidents worth recording(ii). There are other elements of fiction, such as tone, theme, point of view and style, but since the three basic components of the human reality are the self, the universe and the problems we come up against, it seems fitting to conclude that a story’s internal reality is composed of character, setting and conflict(iii).

It’s not enough to create these three elements in a story and then write a story with them; it is also necessary to acknowledge how they’re connected to one another. A story with a vivid setting and a fleshed-out character but no connection between them will make it seem like the characters are ghosts in the world, or that the setting is merely a background instead of an integral part of the story. A story with a vivid setting and a dire conflict but no connection between them will make it seem like the conflict has no place in the world, or that the setting has no place in the tale. And finally, a story with a fleshed-out character and a dire conflict but no connection between them will raise the question of where one should invest in the story, if it’s worth investing in at all. This essay will set out to prove that by having a strong connection between the character, the setting and the conflict, a story will feel more interconnected, have more weight to it, and speak to the human condition more effectively.

This essay is not intended to provide a panacea for writing woes. It’s not even meant to provide a way to make beautiful fiction; that comes with a deep look into the human condition, finding issues we have, and writing about them in a meaningful style. This essay is meant to look at the separate elements that make up a story’s internal world, and to discuss how connected they are, how stories are worse when the relationships are not acknowledged, and a few ways to acknowledge the relationships.

The most commonly acknowledged relationship in fiction, and by far the most significant when thinking of the human condition, is that between conflict and character. The dynamic between them is so common, it has been categorized by its types: man vs. man, man vs. nature, man vs. society, man vs. self, and so on. This relationship guides very event within the story when the two elements are present. If this relationship is weak—that is, if a conflict doesn’t really affect anyone, or if no character is fully invested within the conflict—then the story will not have a driving force, and there will be no reason to invest in it.

With that out of the way, here we go.


Conflict & Character

The most commonly acknowledged relationship in fiction, and by far the most significant when thinking of the human condition, is that between conflict and character. The dynamic between them is so common, it has been categorized by its types: man vs. man, man vs. nature, man vs. society, man vs. self, and so on. This relationship guides very event within the story when the two elements are present. If this relationship is weak—that is, if a conflict doesn’t really affect anyone, or if no character is fully invested within the conflict—then the story will not have a driving force, and there will be no reason to invest in it.

How is this relationship created and strengthened? I think it must first be noted that problems don’t register in people’s minds until it affects them in some manner. Therefore, I believe the first thing that must be acknowledged in creating a strong conflict-character relationship is to establish how to conflict affects the character. This could be, to name a few, physical, psychological, social, familial, financial, spiritual or patriotic. The conflict can either be an injustice or wrong inflicted, an endangerment of something dear, or a want for something unpossessed. In any case, in order for the character to become invested in the conflict, it must put the current state of the character’s life up to change.

Out of this, the character must form a motivation to deal with it. Just as people have reasons to deal with problems, so do characters have reasons to deal with theirs. This is where the character initially affects the conflict—giving it scope, importance, and stakes. The motivation can most likely be found by thinking of what’s important to the character, giving him or her something to fight for. If a character doesn’t have motivation to deal with the conflict, then the fight against it will appear mechanical, instead of having something to fight for.

Once the conflict has enough of an effect on the character, and the character has enough motivation to deal with the conflict, then the two spend the rest of the story wrestling for domination. Their paths through the story are not side-by-side, but rather intertwined, with challenges coming up, weaknesses to overcome, and moments where the character is stronger than the challenge. This intertwining of conflict and character is the most significant relationship of writing a story, since it enables character growth and development. Conflicts are, essentially, opportunities for enlightenment, to find out more about both life and one’s self. It is with this relationship, throughout the story, that we learn how powerful the conflict is, how powerful the character is, and (thinking of ourselves as the characters) how strong we could be. When we connect with a character, we want to see that character grow and change, confront the looming problem, and conquer it. The struggle has its ups and downs—hence the intertwining nature, which leaves neither the character nor the conflict as the dominant force all the time—and ignoring this intertwining nature will make the story very one-sided, without much of a struggle and not much for the reader to invest it.

The relationship between conflict and character is paramount to any story that has these two elements in it. Each story is a case-study into our own lives and our problems. With a powerful threat and proper motivation, the conflict and characters within a story can face off in a meaningful manner. The results of the meaningful interactions are gravity and growth of the problem, growth and development in the character, and a story that evolves from merely existing to one that grows as it continues being read.

Fimfics with notable conflict-character relationships

Apotheosis: The main conflict here is Luna trying to regain her godhood; Twilight was sent to another realm with her, and her conflict is trying to survive. The conflict influences Twilight by providing her with opportunities to show her support for Luna, and it influences Luna by raising and challenging doubts within her. Luna's motivation to get through this is finding out why she's here in the first place, while Twilight's motivation is to get back home safely with Luna. The intertwining relationship between character and conflict come with each challenge that arises along their journey back home.

Who We Are: The conflict's effect on the characters is social, specifically affecting just the Mane 6; one of them is a changeling, and this knowledge strains their sense of trust in one another. To describe the characters' effect on the conflict would be to spoil a major portion of the story, but it should be noted that the characters each have their own reaction to the conflict that initially strengthens mistrust and suffering among them. Their motivation to deal with it is to gain trust within their circle again.

Yours Truly: The conflict is less something dire and more something we experience in our course of life: distance from our friends. The conflict's effect on the characters provides them with benefits—achieving what they want in life—and detriments—not being able to be with those they hold dear. The characters' motivation is simple: to remain connected to their friends.

Dance: This story has no direct conflict, but a conflict that can be inferred from the actions is needing a moment to unwind alone, as Apple Bloom does. Apple Bloom's motivation could be that she just wants to unwind. I think conflict-character relationships can be inferred from stories without apparent conflicts since the conflict could just be needing a sense of normalcy.


Character & Setting

Taking problems out of a story, a character will also interact with the setting. In real life, it is impossible for a person not to be influenced by his or her surroundings, and people have the power to shape their surroundings as they desire. If the relationship between character and setting is weak—that is, if the character doesn’t do much with it, or if the setting has no effect on the character—then the character will seem like a ghost in the world and, more likely, the setting will just fade into the background.

How is a proper character-setting relationship established? Going back to our own reality, the world around us teaches us primarily through our senses. Therefore, to create a vivid setting that interacts with the character, it seem that one must simply acknowledge the important effects the setting has on the senses of the character. From a distance, a setting will have an effect on the person’s sight; depending on the situation, it may also have an effect on the person’s senses of hearing and smell. In proximity to the character, the character can use all of his or her senses to get a sense of the climate of the place.

The senses give the character an immediate sense of how things are; there is also what effect the setting has based on its scales and challenges. Our surroundings teach us, and they also challenge us. Harsh weather endangers us, tall cliffs and dark caves provide greater challenges—basically, nature can provide its own challenge for characters (hence man vs. nature). This is important because in a story where there is a big focus on the setting, an author can have a lot less empty space in his or her story by having nature be the challenge.

Speaking more to the human condition, a setting can also encompass a society, and society teaches people how to live through customs, laws and regulations. This poses a further challenge to a character because now life’s not just about survival, but about coexisting with the society. Not only does the society teach the character; it also admonishes the character for going against the standards society implements. And with differing values and customs in societies, this creates a broad spectrum of how the character will be received. This challenges the character to either stay true to his-or-herself, or change to the standards of the society he or she finds himself or herself in.

These are all the ways that settings teach characters about life; in our quest for evolution and understanding, every human is a case-study into what works and what doesn’t for survival and maintaining peace. Therefore, every human has some effect on the setting. Societally, if we take each individual character in a particular setting as a some of the whole of that society, then the character’s interactions with characters within that society (such as a club, a job, or a village) will not only affect the characters within the society but also the society as a whole. New ideas will be introduced, current ideas will change, and old ideas will perish, all thanks to what the character introduces into the society.

Physically, a character may not interact with distant physical settings at all; what is important to know is that a character can manipulate his immediate surroundings in order to survive. This will probably take care of itself, as if a writer is writing a particular scene where a character needs to survive, the character will look around and use what he or she can to survive. This isn’t as big a deal as societal influencing, I believe, but it may be worth noting that what the character does may have an impact on the setting later on; manipulation of the setting may also help the character while also harming the setting, as in creating a campfire that sets a forest ablaze. The physical surroundings aren’t as forgettable as societal surroundings, but it’s important to note that a character can use his or her surroundings to his or her advantage.

The relationship between character and setting is not so much intertwined as it is more mixed: characters move about in and leave marks on a certain space. The setting depends on the reader taking note of it to not just be a background, and having it affect the character in some way will bring it more into focus. A character’s mark on a setting will make him or her seem to have an impact on the story. Taking the case-study idea of life into mind, a character is the human entering an environment, and we the reader observe how we could handle ourselves given the circumstances.

Fimfics with notable character-setting relationships

Off the Edge of the Map: Not to give too much about this story away, Rainbow Dash and Fluttershy travel to an unexplored island, a dragon settlement, and a deserted city. At each place, the characters quickly learn how to survive and progress through these places, sometimes with the help of the inhabitants there, sometimes not. Rainbow Dash and Fluttershy's main goal is to get home, but through acts of bravery and kindness, they exert their influence over the places they come across.

The Flight of the Alicorn: (mild spoilers) The setting's effect on the characters is that which comes from rapid change: a loss of normalcy and scope. Rarity is barely able to hold her own among the Canterlot aristocracy in the beginning, and then has to eschew her demeanor when she finds herself in the Impenetrable Lands. She comes across several different types of societies, some which influence her to run wild (as in Gallopoli), and some that teach her to take a more mature look at her powers (as it is in the Impenetrable Lands).

Herald: This story's setting constantly informs Mrs. Cake that nothing is safe. The ponies in Ponyville are either on the side of crazed murderers or struggling survivors; there's no in between. This story's power comes from how it portrays Mrs. Cake; her influence on the setting is merely as a survivor (and as to avoid major spoilers, that's all I'll say on that).


Setting & Conflict

The least notable relationship among the elements, not insignificant but the least relatable to the human condition, is the relationship between the setting and the conflict. Even when we’re not at a place to learn experiences and face problems, worlds still exist and problems still arise. Although it’s not relatable to the human condition as much as conflict-character and character-setting relationships, acknowledging how a problem affects the surroundings or how the setting deals with it will make the conflict feel like it has more of a presence in the world, and it will make the world that’s facing it feel more integral to the overall tale.

There are two types of stories I can think of where the setting-conflict relationship really stands out: man vs. nature stories, and stories where there are no characters. In the former, the conflict’s effect on the setting is meant to make it more menacing for the character facing nature to deal with. In the latter’s case, this could mean either that the setting is the main focus (as in “There Will Come Soft Rains”), or that the characters are seen as a society and not really as individuals (such as in “The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World”), where we are meant to observe a place rather than a single self. In both cases, the setting-conflict interaction stands out.

When dealing with a setting-conflict relationship in any other type of story, I think we should take strictly geographic settings as entities untouched by humanity, and societies as a larger version of a character—that is, with an effect from the conflict and a motivation from the setting. Any conflict that affects a setting, whether geographic or societal, with have one of four effects: a detriment where the setting suffers, a benefit where the setting gains, a mix of benefits and detriments, and no effect at all. A setting, in return, will not only react (or not react) to the conflict, but will be set at a certain level of “readiness.” Is the setting prepared to face it? Does it have the proper technology and knowledge? If not, does it at least have the resources? If not, what will happen to the current way of life? A setting in this manner can be treated as a character, in that it is an entity that constantly reacts to the conflict and the changing state of the conflict.

I stated that setting-conflict relationships are the least important relationship in regards to the human condition, but something can be gleamed from acknowledging this relationship: why does the conflict matter? There are many different cultures and places, so where does the specific conflict actually matter, and where does it not? What are the universal problems we deal with? Lack of love? Struggle for resources? Stories are looks at problems that affect us, and having a specific type of setting or various types of settings will help us look at the problem in the grand scope of life.

Fimfics with notable setting-conflict relationships

Triptych: Twilight, Luna and Celestia all have to deal with their own demons in this story, but it should be noted that the settings effect on the conflicts are to treat it without much importance. The gods have taken a distant role in the lives of their subjects, making Celestia struggle with her own inner doubts. In Canterlot, the setting is mostly stagnant, challenging Twilight and Luna's task in ruling over them. The overall conflict is adjusting to change, and the setting may or may not be ready to face it, making the situation that much more interesting to follow.

Pipsqueak's Day Off: This story's setting is seen as a bit laissez-faire, where ponies are grown up and they do their own thing. The big power with this story is the setting's portrayal as much more mature in nature than the show, and this influences the slice-of-life-styled conflict of just dealing with adolescence. The setting's effect on the conflict is their mindset that they can handle anything, which influences Pip's personal conflict of dealing with his own reality and flaws.

Certain Advantages: This is a comedy, but I believe the same principle applies here. The setting is that of ponies trying to bond with each other, and ponies not used to seeing their rulers engage with them much on a personal level or engage in competition. That competition, though, (which can be called the "conflict") is highly influenced by the reactions of the society that isn't used to this, leading to very nice comedy all around.


The conflict-character relationship helps bring problems into the focus of how it affects us, the character-setting relationship helps shape the internal world of the story, and the setting-conflict relationship helps put the conflict into a larger scope. It must be acknowledged, though, that since the self, the universe and struggles are in a neverending state of interaction so long as we exist, character, setting and conflict actually interact as one, inseparable from the other two. In the most basic of states, a character exists in a setting where the two influence each other—one through senses and laws, he other through ideas and actions—and these two are constantly struggling to maintain and better their state of being.

So in terms of writing, there are three crucial questions I think can be asked while acknowledging these relationships:

1. What effect does the conflict produce? We read stories for the conflict, and whether it affects the character, the setting or both, it will speak to the human condition in some manner.
2. Why should the conflict be dealt with? Life is a constant struggle, and stories are a small piece of life. Therefore, there must be a reason that the conflict should receive focus to us.
3. When does the conflict have the upper hand, and when does it not? This is more in line with writing the actual plot of the story rather than planning it out. This is basically asking, how does the story go?

Addressing these three simple questions, I believe that a story can have more fleshed out characters that have a stake in the story, a setting that actually shapes the world instead of just being background, and a conflict that actually has the gravity to warrant attention. All three of these elements will come together to create a story not just with existence, but with life.


What do you think? Do you think I'm on the right track? Do you think I'm off base? Is there any way I can improve this theory and essay, either in ideas or just by the way I write it? I know I have a problem with rambling and with presenting coherent ideas, so any help you have will be greatly appreciated. I would like feedback on my ideas, but I appreciate your reading it regardless. I also confess that I'm not well-read, so if you have any other examples that can apply, or examples that contradict the theory, please feel free to provide them.

Endnotes:
(i)The idea that stories can speak to the human condition comes from two sources. The first place I received it is from Holly Henry, my currentpy professor of Literary Theory and Criticism. The second is from an excerpt from an essay by Germaine Necker de Staël’s Essay on Fictions, which was found in The Notrton Anthology of Theory and Criticism: second Edition (excerpt from pages 507-515). “…if [stories] touch our hearts, they can have a great influence on all our moral ideas.” (de Staël 508)
(ii)Specific words and ideas from this sentence come from a quote by innovative fiction writer Ronald Sukenick: “New fiction requires new criteria, but such criteria will be rooted in the essentials of the medium: not plot, but ongoing incident; not characterization, but consciousness struggling with circumstance; not social realism, but a sense of situation; and so on.” This quote was found in an essay in one of the books from The Norton Anthology of American Literature: Seventh Edition, Volume E (though I don’t remember the page numbers).
(iii)Plot is more often considered a literary element than conflict, and a conflict is a part of the plot, but since conflict is what guides the plot, and since plot, in our reality, refers to a plan of how something’s going to play out, I shall talk about conflict rather than plot in this essay.
Credit must also be given to Daetrin for listening to my ideas and providing many insights of his own.

Comments ( 5 )

If somepony puts a gun to my head and tells me to organize a con, you're heading my fanfic panel.

1810739 Thank you very much for the feedback! Although I do hope I can get some feedback on my ideas; I would like to know what others think of these ideas.

1810739 Also, if I may ask, do you think this blog might be good enough for the FimFiction Editorial? Sorry for pressing for more, but I'm desperate for feedback on this.

1812746
I see it as a worthy (pardon the expression) tutorial; I have never quite believed that there is One True Path to Story Success, and I think the full membership ought to be exposed to as many methods as possible.

On the question of conflict vs. plot, I come down somewhere in the middle: there has to be a reason for the protagonist to behave this way, but it might not be something mentioned in the story -- until it pops up in a later chapter, perhaps. Then again, my own technique consists largely of throwing up words on the screen and then deleting the ones I don't like.

1813295 I can agree with your point on conflict vs. character; I've seen firsthand how introducing motivation later on in the story works to its advantage with "Herald". That leaves a bit of mystery to the story as we follow the protagonist, methinks.

And I also believe there's no one way to write a story (if that's what you mean by "story success"). I tried to make this essay as unbiased towards a specific tactic as possible, instead looking at the elements that could are used with all (or at the very least most; I can't think of any tactics that don't use character, setting or conflict) styles.

I'll be rereading the essay as I get new ideas from users and editing as they appeal to me. In any case, thank you for offering some new ideas for me to consider. :pinkiehappy:

Login or register to comment