The words 'cute' or 'endearing' aren't exactly words one uses to describe the filmography of Paul Thomas Anderson, a director whose filmography is known for its cynical and, at times, pessimistic look at human nature. These words are also not ones I'd use to describe Adam Sandler, a man whose 'films' generally consist of a vulgar sludge of lowest brow humor that would make a caveman want to destroy any and all traces of them.
This is simply one of the best World War II films I've ever seen.
Oliver Hirschbiegel's sprawling two and a half hour opus chronicles in frighteningly intimate detail the final ten days of Adolph Hitler's life, crafting a tightly wound narrative that never ever shy's from depicting Hitler in all of his monstrous mania, yet still manages to make these monstrous people feel strangely human, yet never make us feel sorry for them.
Yo, what's up, Kemosabes?
This is your friendly film, TV show, and episode reporter here with another review.
Today, for the first installment of this year's "Christmas in July" series, I'm gonna give you guys my take of "I'll Be Home For Christmas". The 1998 Disney film starring Jonathan Taylor Thomas, to be precise.
Here's the rundown of it:
Just thought I'd tell you guys, I'm giving you a few poster pictures for films I plan on reviewing later in time. When I have the time to do so. It won't be in the order its shown, but they are a few films I plan to review for you guys.
Aloha, Kemosabes.
This is your friendly film, TV show, and episode reporter here with another review.
Today, I'm gonna give you guys my take of Disney's "George of the Jungle".
👋🏻 Hey, guys! Once again, I’m back with another review.
Today, following my review of Walt Disney’s Mary Poppins, I make my movie review by reviewing Disney's Saving Mr. Banks.
Here's the rundown of it:
Rating Scale:
12/10—a complete masterpiece; flawless and outstanding
11/10—Excellent, near-perfect film
10/10—the standard rating; awesome film with a couple of flaws
9/10—a wonderful film with several flaws
Rating Scale:
12/10—a complete masterpiece; flawless and outstanding
11/10—Excellent, near-perfect film
10/10—the standard rating; awesome film with a couple of flaws
9/10—a wonderful film with several flaws
Rating Scale:
12/10—a complete masterpiece; flawless and outstanding
11/10—Excellent, near-perfect film
10/10—the standard rating; awesome film with a couple of flaws
9/10—a wonderful film with several flaws
8/10–a great film with numerous flaws but not enough to ruin it
I think Eleanor Roosevelt had baboon arms. I mean I can't totally confirm this and maybe it was just the dress she was wearing but it looked like she had some King Louis length arms going on there. It was almost as if she could scratch the back of her knee without having to reach. Again I can't confirm this but it was just something I noticed before she started reading something from General Washington (obviously this was before he became president).
tbh i really feel like they were trying to make up for all the criticism of part 1 lmao
SPOILERS AHEAD. Just a bullet-point list, but still.
Paul Thomas Anderson's third feature marked the peak of his increasingly complex ensemble dramas, marking the exceptional maturation and expansion of the stylistic and storytelling tropes he first properly explored in Boogie Nights.
Paul Thomas Anderson's second film is a fascinating, intentionally sprawling examination of the lives of those sucked into the California porn industry in the late 1970s through the early 1980s, and not only provides a unique lens in which to view the time period, also manages to humanize these characters, while still highlighting the exploitative and demeaning elements of the industry, coupled with the allure of stardom and fame that it promises.
Happy Earth Day, my friends.
This is your top-of-the-line film, TV show, and episode reporter here with another review.
Today, I'm gonna give you all my take of Disney-Pixar's "WALL-E".
Here's the rundown of this tale:
Rating Scale:
12/10—a complete masterpiece; flawless and outstanding
11/10—Excellent, near-perfect film
10/10—the standard rating; awesome film with a couple of flaws
9/10—a wonderful film with several flaws
8/10–a great film with numerous flaws but not enough to ruin it
In what is possibly the most beautifully confusing cinematic experience I've had, Paul Thomas Anderson's most recent feature, and his seventh film, manages to to be an absurdest, stoned out trip down the sweaty, drug addled and sex crazed summer byways of 1970 Los Angeles, as we follow an equally absurdest and stoned out private detective as he is quickly dragged into an incomprehensible conspiracy involving hippies, Neo-Nazis allied Jewish land developers, cults, and Chinese heron dealers,
April Fools Day, my friends!
This is your top-of-the-line film, TV show, and episode reporter here with another review.
Today, to celebrate the occasion, I'm gonna give you guys my take of Dreamworks's "Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie".
Here's the rundown of this adventure:
Hello, my good friends and loyal viewers.
This is your friendly film, TV show, and episode reporter here with another review.
And today, for my 7th "Thanksgiving Treat", I'm gonna give you guys a review on Dreamworks's "Over the Hedge".
Here's the summary of it:
Greetings and salutations, my friends.
This is your top-of-the-line film, TV show, and episode reporter here with another review.
Today, I'm gonna give you guys my 3rd reexamination of a film:
A re-analyzing of Sam Raimi's "Spider-Man 3"/review of the editor's cut by Bob Murawski.