Going to Seed (Review)

Well, let's see how much of this episode I refuse to tolerate. (After all, if my haters can whine, bullshit and bellyache about my stories and other people's stories, I can do the same... and they way they tell me

"Get over yourself"

"F you... just F you"

Looks like I got under their skin,

(Paybacks are the sweetest) what goes around comes around.

LP: 8000

"Helping Hoof" you said it properly

-No damage

The Great Seedling?

Hmm...

-No damage, holding it... (I smell a falsehood)

Hmm... Well, Applejack's right, both ways (And I don't like going both ways even if I have to) It's okay for Applebloom to have fun (and be a kid) but she can't neglect her duties.

And excellent comeback, Granny. (Makes me kind of regret having her passed in Starfleet 8)

-No damage.

(So far, not so bad, maybe this could be a good one)

"Every pony at their best"

Here's a thought, GET EVEN MORE HELP!!

-200 for stupidity. (And I deem AJ the sanest of the mane ponies)

LP: 8000 -----> 7800

(Goldie giggling) Ah huh... I thought I smelled something fishy.

-Still holding the damage (Waiting to see how serious it is)

Hmm... Applejack's being a little too much of a spoiled sport here, then again I would be too if I suspected I was being tricked. Still, wanting to destroy Applebloon's illusions and scar her, that's not cool.

-200

LP: 7800 -----> 7600

Ah, Bright Mac and Pear Butter (Buttercup) I'm actually really glad I brought them back In Starfleet 7. They make great story plots.

Much as I still think this is all a setup, I applaud Applejack for realizing the evidence could suggest otherwise. Not all proof is concrete enough.

-No Damage

Ah huh... I thought so... total setup

-Still holding the damage (Because I'm sure I know what's coming next)

Ah huh... the old Cliche, "If you didn't do it, who did"

1000, for all the holding in a did and all the flaws and cliche's I've seen

LP: 7600 -----> 6600

FINAL SCORE: 6600

All in all, this ep wasn't bad.

None of that overbearing friendship talk
No over-development of character growth.

...Ahhhhh

Comments

[Lord King Cocoon]

You probably won't like me for doing this. But I'm going to temporarily go into "Grammar Nazi" mode.

I applaud Applejack for realizing the evidence could suggest otherwise.

Technically, it's not evidence unless it DOES suggest one possibility over any others. But for the sake of argument, you're right that it doesn't have to be concrete evidence. It can be used to support another possibility depending on what other evidence is provided.

Not all proof is concrete enough.

That is not true. By definition, proof is concrete. I think you're conflating the definitions of proof and evidence. Not all EVIDENCE is concrete. But proof is by definition concrete evidence. Also, proof only exists in mathematics.