Answering a question with an unrelated statement is stupid · 11:43pm Dec 16th, 2016
If you ask someone a yes/no question like "Want to go see Rogue One?" and they answer with something like "I had to wake up at 330 to go to work", then you can make a few assumptions.
1. They're passive aggressive
2. They're a fucking moron.
3. They can't use their big boy words to just say no like an adult.
Of course my reply was "Good for you, so you beat traffic!"
Anyway I'm going to go see Rogue One now, and I don't have to take any passive-aggressive family members with me which is fine. I didn't want to interact socially today anyway. 
I should be in a good enough mood when I get back to do some writing. Also, I'll probably write some CMC because asshole family members + holidays = perfect recipe for homicidal fantasies.
p.s. speaking of passive aggressive I was re-watching Arrested Development while I was sick, and I think they went a little too far with the characters. Like, I think they're more fucked up then the cast of Sunny in Philadelphia. At least in Sunny they have redeeming characteristics, but I just can't get past how awful everyone is in Arrested Development. Maybe the fact they're all so unrelatable is what they were aiming for? Or it's a precursor to the "Don't Cringe" challenge?
The Don't Cringe Challenge
*If Netflix can make a new season of Arrested Development, does this mean Netflix can make a new "Netflix Semi-Original Series" season of Firefly? We're only down like 2 of the main cast so far, there isn't much time left! (The Preacher died irl and Wash died catching a giant spear with his face like a boss.)
I'm just sad my pet theory about Rogue One is pretty well and bunk
Spoiler alert! This movie has space ships in it!
I found it a great movie, worthy of the Star Wars name.
Doesn't that just mean 'No because I'm really tired?' It doesn't sound especially passive aggressive.
4342754 This. If someone on a diurnal sleep schedule has to wake up that early, they're obviously gonna be dead tired by mid-afternoon. They were most likely trying to give you some context, rather than just a blunt 'no'.