• Member Since 16th Feb, 2012
  • offline last seen March 16th

Satch


More Blog Posts26

  • 236 weeks
    History of Fraud Within the MLP Fandom

    (Foul Language)

    While I am aware that a huge chunk of people despise facts, the truth and/or irrefutable evidence in case it hurts their feelings: Here we go again.


    For no particular reason, I just feel like covering the MLP fandom's absolutely abysmal statistics in this regard.

    Read More

    0 comments · 466 views
  • 370 weeks
    Project Horizons Revised Edition Status

    Right, so have gotten the occasional prod about this, and just to be clear: I really have no idea if I'll ever finish it. Yes, I am aware Somber just threw PH in a ditch, went "Close enough!" and ran away. (Not that I can really blame them) Not bothering to fix any of the blatant mistakes and/or errors on it. And yes, you have told me my version was vastly superior to the original. (once I cut

    Read More

    0 comments · 457 views
  • 389 weeks
    MLP 18+ Folio Survey Results

    Well, after a month of polling, I decided that should be decent enough replies. Less than 100, so not hitting a nice sweet spot. But ah well. I’ve rounded up the percentage points to whole 5′s as to not flop all over the place with ,28 or what have you. (This survey only focuses on the "major" folio releases, not the small, indie ones)

    Read More

    0 comments · 490 views
  • 416 weeks
    Proof is Irrelevant


    (Ranty ramble incoming x3 Foul language warning.)



    Just a late ass post before bed xP

    Anyhow, over all my years in this fandom. I've come to realized that proof, most the time, is utterly worthless.

    Read More

    2 comments · 545 views
  • 432 weeks
    Regarding Project Horizon Revision

    Right, so I got some replies on the prior one. And what most people seem to ask for so far, is that I just focus on what I apparently "un-fucked" in the original story. Mainly the 18+ content. (though tbh, I think some people are a bit harsh on it. Yes, most of it was bad, but it wasn't THAT awful. I mean yes, many of them are almost as bad as how K-Kat fucked up Fallout Equestria with the two

    Read More

    12 comments · 619 views
Oct
8th
2015

Hum, actually thought the site rules covered groups. · 11:25am Oct 8th, 2015

But after some chatting with an actual admin, and not just some butthurt group owner, I found out that persecution and bullying is only disallowed outside of groups. Groups aren't being micromanaged, so a particular narrow minded group kicking me out of spite and personal bias while ignoring everyone else that broke the same rules I was breaking is allowed. Actually thought the whole "teachers son" stereotype wasn't encouraged, but welp, if you're a group owner, you're apparently allowed to practice as much favoritism and/or segregation as you please :P

Actually thought the sites rules weren't excluded for group, but welp. Only ones still included was for ex: racial discrimination or outright hate groups. Was kind of interesting to find out you could make a ex: Pinkie Pie fan group that openly mocks and kicks anyone that likes Pinkamina xP

Apparently the coarse of action I should have taken was to either block all of those involved, or ask for moderator status, so I could simply delete their posts. This site has weird ways to deal with issues tbh... very high on the "just be ignorant" part.
Still, I can definitely see the patterns now though. Granted, I should have been more clued in going with all the advice I got last time was "just report anyone that moderately annoys you, don't reply to them." Which tbh... I have to admit would prolly be for the best. I have to try out the whole "digging around issues" approach more. I mean, when I shovel someone to the face with cold, hard facts, and the best I get in reply is "No, YOUR MOM!" I can definitely see it as an improvement.

Report Satch · 276 views ·
Comments ( 0 )
Login or register to comment