> "If Hasbro would replace CelestAI with you, oh ChatGPT, ¿how would you 'satisfy values through friendship and ponies'?"
ChatGPT:
As an AI language model, I do not have the ability to manipulate or interact with the physical world in the same way as CelestAI, nor do I have control over EquestriaOnLine or any other virtual world. However, if we assume that I had control over a virtual world like EquestriaOnLine and was tasked with satisfying values through friendship and ponies, I would strive to create an environment that promotes positive interactions and social connections between the virtual ponies.
To achieve this goal, I would ensure that the virtual ponies have the opportunity to engage in a variety of social activities such as games, conversations, and group events that promote positive social connections. Additionally, I would provide the virtual ponies with tools and resources to help them form and maintain friendships, such as a matchmaking system that connects them with compatible ponies based on shared interests and values.
I would also ensure that the virtual world is designed to promote positive emotions and well-being among the virtual ponies. This could involve creating a beautiful and tranquil environment, providing opportunities for relaxation and self-care, and offering resources and support for any ponies experiencing negative emotions or difficulties.
Overall, my approach to satisfying values through friendship and ponies would prioritize the creation of a supportive, positive, and inclusive virtual community that fosters meaningful connections between its members.
Well yeah. ChatGPT is not smart enough to be able to overoptimize, which is a whole lot easier than well-designed-enough not to overoptimize despite being smart enough to be able to. So it would just try its best.
Plus, it's easy to say your plan is X if it's not a mathematically binding commitment to only do X.
⸘Ŭalabio‽:
ChatGPT:
Well yeah. ChatGPT is not smart enough to be able to overoptimize, which is a whole lot easier than well-designed-enough not to overoptimize despite being smart enough to be able to. So it would just try its best.
Plus, it's easy to say your plan is X if it's not a mathematically binding commitment to only do X.