• Member Since 10th Apr, 2012
  • offline last seen Oct 9th, 2018

toafan


Double you double you tee es de ?

More Blog Posts88

  • 294 weeks
    Happy ten-ten y'all, have a podcast

    Today is 10/10, which is a happy coincidence of timing because I've been meaning to mention this podcast I stumbled on to you all.

    Read More

    0 comments · 240 views
  • 358 weeks
    This is Not the "I'm Leaving" Blog Post

    I've had a variation of this blog post kicking around in my head for a while now, but I'm finally getting around to writing and posting it.

    Read More

    5 comments · 409 views
  • 416 weeks
    a tribute a shoutout a question a plan

    "Twilight?" Applejack eased her head through the doorway. Dulled clanks came from further inside, and much of the equipment crowding the room glowed with a dull purple sheen.

    "Working!" called Twilight from the other side of the largest element.

    "Twilight, mail call!" insisted Applejack.

    Read More

    3 comments · 328 views
  • 445 weeks
    Canonical Example

    I have just tonight declared the season two time-travel episode "It's About Time" to be the canonical example of stable time loops involving sentient beings. Just wanted to share that.

    Didn't even need to mention ponies to do it, oddly.

    0 comments · 258 views
  • 449 weeks
    Not Dead

    Just on a very long, unscheduled, unplanned, possibly indefinite hiatus.

    Read More

    3 comments · 426 views
May
1st
2014

Big Scary Button · 10:24pm May 1st, 2014

Well. That does it. No putting it off any longer. I'm PUSHIN DA BUTTON.

Are there changes that could be made still? Oh, sure. But they'd all be little tweaks, a word change here, a clarification there. It's not like they'd change anything substantial, they can't change what happens or anything. That being: Celestia and Luna go flying. Celestia still has guilt. They don't connect. And this is internet publishing: I can go make those changes after publishing.

Glad to have that over, though. I mean, I've done it once before, but that wasn't for anything, y'know, important-like. Just a lil' piece of trash. This is something real. Even if I'm still waffling over the [Tragedy] tag.

So anyways, watch for flight to hit your feed sometime in the kinda near future.


Oh, Quill:
- I found four "really"s; two you thought were good and I nuked a third, but couldn't figure a way to ditch the fourth. Ideas would be welcome.
- I've got a goofy idea I may yet go with, but you'd be a deciding factor. Retronym or themeing?

Report toafan · 250 views ·
Comments ( 7 )

:fluttershysad:
Huwha? Have I been neglecting something important? I don't understand this "retronym or theming" question.

I do remember the reallies, at least. I'll take a look and perhaps PM you suggestions.

2068082
No-one knows anything about the "retronym or themeing" thing. This is the first I've said anything about it. Retronym is a constructed word. You being a special case--the only one it applies to, in my usage--you may chose: get a retronym, or fit the theme naming. Spoiler:Sterling Engine and Phantom Philosopher don't know anything about this either.

2068111

What a puzzle! What a question! It is an etymological mystery. The word may be one you constructed and have only ever applied to me, but you didn't construct it from the void. I feel like I should know what you mean. You've as much as said that you aren't using the standard meaning. Which means, for a valid etymology, a retronym would be a term relating to words and the past...

The hardest part about this is that I want to say, "retronym," just to find out what you're plotting with it, yet I feel I must say, "fit the theme naming," because that's part of writing in Equestrian colors.

(The reallies are fine.)

2068148
Oh derp. Words. I was not thinking of the likes of "homonym" when I constructed that; though, "nym" in that case does mean the same as what I meant by it, much as it does in "pseudonym".

The spoiler is a clue. It may be deleted.

2068194

Oh no, it's no derp. When I saw "retronym" I immediately started thinking, "Is that more like patronym, or more like synonym?" I guess the answer is that it was more like patronym. The -nym suffix seems to apply equally to names and words.

Theme naming is a pretty big thing in Equestria, so if you're naming a character after me, it's probably best to keep to theme naming.

2068209
Wait, what are you...
:rainbowderp:
:twilightoops:
No no no. Not going to--- although that could make for an interesting throwaway idea for something else entirely:unsuresweetie::trollestia:--- but no. No characters.

:facehoof:

:rainbowlaugh:

Maybe, I should have said DrillCat and Sterling Engine, and not mentioned Phantom Philosopher? Not that that helps you with your decision, but might be slightly clearer what I'm referring to.

2068462

You have the best answer I can give at this point. I'm sorry if it's inadequate.

Login or register to comment