The Doctor has lived a long life, and he's seen a few things.
He walked away from the Last Great Time War. He marked the passing of the timelords. He saw the birth of the universe, and he watched as time ran out, moment by moment, until nothing remained. No time, no space, just him. He has watched universes freeze and creations burn, he has seen things you wouldn't believe; he has lost things you will never understand. And he knows things: secrets that must never be told, knowledge that must never be spoken, knowledge that would make parasite gods blaze.
But in 909 years of time and space, he has NEVER seen ANYTHING quite like where he just found himself.
//
Featured on: 7-12-14, 8-22-14, 9-8-14, 9-20-14
Chapters (5)
this seems good, very good, now is this Tennant or Smith? i dont remember which incarnation was 900, because at the last mention of his age in the series, he is 1200
unless you forgot that little minute detail that rarely pops up, in which case, you are welcome!
*LakieLegion slips under a clothed table, rump poking out the back and snout poking out the front*
3529063
Its tennant who's 900-
Wait a minute...
David TENnant
Matt SmELEVENith
Wake up people
3529100
that doesn't work, Tennant is the only one with his respective Doctor incarnation in his name, plus he technically isn't ten, because Hurt is supposed to be an incarnation from during the Great Time War, between McGann and Eccleston
also, small trivia about the actors of Doctor Who, Matt Smith was the youngest actor at his introduction at 27, while John Hurt, the newest face introduced, is the eldest actor at time of introduction, at 73, who is a spectacular 18 years older than the previous eldest actor at their introduction, which was the very first doctor, William Hartnell, who was 55 during his premiere
3529134
I am not worthy
3529149 whut? not worthy for what? the random trivia?
3529159
Indeed
3529178 you... confound me... you shall be spared when i take control...
I shall watch this story.
For, with a little work this story will go a loong way!
Namedrop!
YES! You did the best thing anyone ever says in the show, when The Doctor introduces himself, and they reply "Dr. Who?" Best thing ever right there
Luckily, I did a bit of basic research before today so I wasn't completely lost during today's anniversary or this story. I'll keep an eye on it.
3530479
But no "It's bigger on the inside!"
cool Tennant was 20% cooler than matt but there both still AWESOME
3533686 Definately David Tennant for best Doctor, and I actually liked Christopher Ecclestone as well- I don't tend to hear much love for him. Another Doctor that I liked was Sylvester McCoy... And I'm not ashamed...
So, I've gone from Smith to Tennant to Smith to Tennant to McGann, all in one chapter.
your story has caught my eye
But when it comes to "ditzy doo" I am just gong to pretend your typoing her name and pretend to see Derpy instead 
4671253 Really, its just a preference, just ignore the headcanon of others and you'll be fine.
However, doesn't Ditzy also (though not directly or as insultingly (?)) connote being silly/scatterbrained?
4671253
If were like sheep as you say then what is the point of your comment?
4671253
There has been no indication that Ditzy is "challenged" in any way other than being wall eyed and a bit clumsy, assuming she has some sort of genuine impairment because of that is stereotyping. Also, "Derpy" is no more an insult than is "Goofy", and given that you have no trouble referring to people who disagree with you "sheep" and "harlot" you really have no leg to stand on when it comes to berating others for offensive name calling.
SQUEE METER OVERLOAD
4671253 First off, her original name is Ditzy as stated in one of the earliest episodes. The fandom called her Derpy whom can also be considered canon due to last round up, as they had, also originally, intended that to be her name until people like you spoke up. Ergo, both are canon. Bright Eyes is a nice name when one wants to be neutral and not call her either name, it was created by one of the writes who wanted this course of action. Secondly, her name is entirely up to one's preference. I choose Ditzy because I like how it sounds when I say it. But I use Derpy in my stories because I like the way Derpy feels when I type it. Does that make me a sheep? Or does that mean that I have weird preferences?
But aside from that I agree with this guy here. 4682543
I like this; in most stories the Doctor changes into a pony once he enters Equestria's dimension, but in this instance he uses the old, broken chameleon circuit to change himself. Nice touch.
is there going to be more episodes/chapters for this story
4796696 yes
4796703 ok and why is this story mark as complete now since you said they will be more episodes/chapters for this story
I had to do a double take at Ditzy's mothers name. Love the chapter. Miss Jack. Both to be expected.
First you go for Daleks and now you're going for the Weeping Angels. You're certainly not holding back on the threat level.
4796809 Detail? I was referring to the resemblance to my name, what are you talking about?
4796822 garsh dangit, replied to the wrong comment. Ignore me, ignore me
4796713 that is a detail I did not spot!
I will remedy the situation immediately
4796882 ok
Oh joy, Weeping Angels. We're all going to diiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiie!
Mr. and Mrs. Do? I've got two words of advice for ya: Don't blink at all.
(Note: If anybody who read that thought I was channeling Phil the satyr from Disneys Hercules, you thought right.)
Here we go again, off on an amazing journey.
4799473 hadn't considered that! But I do believe something like that will be in order
Oh, god, the Angels. OH GOD, THE TARDIS. THEY LOCKED IT, RIGHT???
If Angels can see in the dark, what happens if you spray their eyes with reflective material, like molten gold?
What happens to an Angel that you observe through an interferometer, and force into a superposition state along with an infinite number of pidgeons?
4799962 you stop that
4800315
what happens if you hit an Angel with a rapidly oscilating field of acoustic force, like a gint ultrasound flugelhorn, that causes al their crystaline atoms to rub against each other, vibrate into powder and disintegrate, or if held by stronger forces, till they melt, boil, ionise?
If all Angels are identical, can this be set up as a resonance condition so all you do is put one in the target spot and all of them go boom?
What if its scaled up to gravitational flux levels that cause quantum deisruptions, then place a Dalek in teh same place?
I want to start using my high power planetary stuff, but theres nothing that takes anywhere near a mountain of total conversion mass to remove.
I thought this was dead~~~!!!!!!!
4801960 looks like somepony didn't read the blogpost
4801977 It's not MY fault.
That's an awful failsafe, as most likely the one it would zero onto is a sun.
4804000 if the shields are up, the TARDIS could probably land on the sun. But I see your point. Ah well
This is why I'm proud to be a Whovian.
THE DALEKS TAKE MANEHATTAN!
ANGELS IN PONYVILLE!
THE DOCTOR! IN! EQUESTRIA!
THIS STORY!
At least it's not the Weeping Draconequuseses...es.
Awesome update!