Page generated in 0.035 seconds
Total duration
914 users online
274,132 hits today, 2,126,319 yesterday
My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic Fanfiction
Designed and coded by knighty & Xaquseg - © 2011-2024
Support us
SubStar
Chat!
Discord
Follow us
Twitter
MLP: Friendship is Magic® - © 2024 Hasbro Inc.®
Fimfiction is in no way affiliated with or endorsed by Hasbro Inc.®
I just died from cuteness overload
Silent Whisper should keep writing, a lot.
8195673
And I just died from such kind praise! Thank you for your support, and for reading! ♥
This is just adorable. I love everything about it!
That art isn't NSFW; it's CUTE! Going into Faal Sahrot Pel; the Great Writing now!
great work, super cute
I must admit that it was quite adorable. And after reading it and seeing the art work I can't help seeing Windy Whistle as a cat and that being part of the development of some of Rainbow Dash's behavior. It was wonderfully written and flowed without missing a beat to the song it conjures as you read it. Well done, well done indeed.
Thou art adorable as was this wonderful piece of writing Silent
derpicdn.net/img/view/2017/5/28/1447678__suggestive_artist-colon-wolfmask_bow+hothoof_scootaloo_windy+whistles_spoiler-colon-s07e07_blindfold_blushing_comic_johnny+bravo_spread+wings_.png
8200031 No 'Marm' is a perfectly legit, if very old fashioned way of saying that.
*when you wanted TwilightxDocxRarity clop in the new chapters, but only got a Twi fantasy, and a Fluttershy scene*
s2.quickmeme.com/img/1d/1d2143cac1476ebd25c64d037befabcca7bdc5e00f6628e6ffd4a533f47c199f.jpg
This is the best fanfic for these fetishes 1000/10
8195696
You have a good way with words, judging by your previous vignette entry. I’d like to see your take with an old-school limerick (y’know, since the story is obscene, half of it is covered).
Okay ive read the first few chapter *1-10* or if you got confused from that *Prologue to Chapter 5* And this chapter and...I dont like it though that is my personal opinion Its not 'me' y'know? its like....*too much* will not be continuing reading no downvote or upvote.
I came here from the Derpibooru posts...I'm just blown away. Haven't even started reading too deeply and i want to read it all, it's all so adorable hot and sexy. Even the bits with some realism like if someone's being a douche :3 I love it. Kudos to whoever started the Clocktower Society
Oh I am just loving it so far
I've been seeing good things about this universe, and finally came over to check it out on Seraphem's endorsement. I'm... not entirely sure what to make of it. The worldbuilding is amazing, and it seems like a really nice depiction of good BDSM, even if there is some merit to the complaint that the slave roleplay colors nearly all the disparate scenes in Clocktower. I didn't even mind the characters being written as archetypes in the first part -- it's a perfectly legitimate technique, and worked well for your purposes -- and while the trasition back to their canon personalities was a bit jarring (especially for Rarity), they've settled into them nicely and you have a good handle on how to write their voices.
The issue is in the clop. The scenarios are definitely intriguing (even the ones that don't quite work for me) and the pacing through them is really well-timed. Your descriptions, even, are pretty nicely developed. It's just that the dirty talk and common euphemisms always jump out at me, and not in a good way. I think it's a combination of too many bad clopfics (and things outside the fandom) using the erotically-charged language as an excuse to get out of writing detailed imagery and me not sharing the opinion that talking about someone's "marehood" or "cock" is sexy, but I have a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to it. Maybe my asexuality plays into the latter of those a bit as well; I can't argue that the words don't have value to most people in the face of so much erotica using them. Even that's gotten better in the recent chapters, however, though the "like a connoisseur of fine wine" line would much more poetic as a one-off than it is being used three and a half times in eight chapters and four vignettes -- discounting guest pieces -- two of which were in the same (literary) scene. I'll definitely be watching this, not only for the world but also because the clop is legitimately good despite my criticisms, but I do seem slightly outside the target audience.
8195696
It's worth every bit of that praise. Manifest mentioned in the note on your first vignette that they were trying to convince you to write a full story in Pet Town; if that's still in question, consider mine a voice in whole-hearted support. I think you've helped me find a new kink.
Okay, I've got a big love/hate relationship with this story. I absolutely love the story itself, how immersion it can be. It had me hooked. The idea of this deep, expansive underground society just rubs me the right way. But then there's the clop.
Don't get me wrong, I love some of the scenes, but the fact that there is such an abusive role play going on here just kills it. The painplay with the apparent albeit fake disregard to the slave while in character is just wrong to me. It's not healthy to me, and it's far from hot. Others will like it, but I simply don't.
Now, if a kinder piece of clop were to be published, that would be hot beyond words to me. You talked about collar coding, and how a gold band indicated desire for a softer dom, and I want this to be explored. The roughness of the current pieces is almost disturbing to me. But don't take it from me. I'm simply giving my two cents.
I'm keeping an eye on this one, for sure.
In a shameful way I have to say that I read everything so far in 6 hours (what am I doing with my time), you're making me like this kinks (more than one) *stay out of my mind* so far I enjoyed reading this and I'm just waiting for twilight's fate
Btw TWILIGHT WHAT WERE YOU THINKING!!!
8329002
BDSM is about one party dominating and another submitting (it's right there in the acronym, after all), and the domination aspect in particular is something that is inherently NOT a warm/kind thing to do to another. Granted, BDSM play is not supposed to be hateful or harmful on a long-term/core level, and thus is not colloquially "abusive", it's just not made of plush, feathery down and kindness.
But nonetheless, there is no BDSM without an air (false or otherwise) of inequality, ownership, and just plain coldness in predominant aspects of such a relationship (and that's the whole point to even being into BDSM in the first place, some people want to sexualize ~false~ superiority, others want to sexualize ~false~ inferiority, while both parties obviously know that it's just kinky roleplay and that they're all equals in reality).
Back to the primary topic though: To say it'd be better with more kindness is to say it would be better if it didn't exist.
The concept of kindness and dominance in this highly sexualized context ARE mutually exclusive.
This doesn't mean they don't love one another, far from it.
It simply means that without the harshness you're so opposed to, there absolutely cannot be a BDSM element to it.
Let alone the fact that it's not just an element in this case, but rather, it's a fundamental and majority aspect.
8376883
I disagree. Domination and submission can be warm and kind and loving. It's not often shown that way, but there is nothing that says it can't be.
I've got a fix planned that deals with the gentler side of BDSM, set in the CTS universe. It's not all rough, my friend. And there's no wrong way to do it, so long as there's consent.
8376904
I disagree that the act of domination can be a tender/loving thing.
I feel you have simply misunderstood the true meaning behind what I stated, however.
It can be done with those emotions driving it, and it can be done with a tender/loving reason for it, but the act itself is an act of asserting force to direct another into doing something they would not otherwise do. There is no evolved creature alive that appreciates being dominated simply for the sake of being dominated. It in itself is a violent act. Now, if it's overshrouded by sexual ideology for the dominated party, then it's a form of accepted violence as a means to an end (sexual gratification), but the core of the act of dominating another is strictly a negative.
Much like whipping someone, sure, that can be used for mutual gratification of both parties, but the act of violently whipping someone at it's core is NOT in any way a loving act. It is simply causing harm for the sake of causing harm and inflicting pain.
This does NOT invalidate the positive reasoning behind using it for sex, though.
On the contrary, it reinforces that positive. The driving force behind said negative act is to strengthen a positive outcome, which makes the entire affair more than acceptable, it makes it a wonderful thing, as the end result does no lasting harm yet in most circumstances results in lasting good for the consenting parties involved without affecting others in any way (other than at worst putting said third party/parties in a state of unease if they're not keen on the concept).
A less on-point analogy might help convey what I mean, so here's another way to look at it.
Much like cutting someone's flesh open is a negative thing to do, it can be done for beneficial reasons.
IE, someone needs a life-saving surgical procedure, like an appendectomy. By temporarily harming them, the surgeon is doing them lasting, vital good. In fact, it's saving their life in the here-and-now, as well as for years to come.
But that doesn't change the fact that to cut someone down to (and extraction of) the vital organs IS a negative thing, regardless of the driving reason behind it.
It simply means that said act will have lasting beneficial effects, with little-to-no lasting harmful effects (or at the very least, it's the far more preferable option to otherwise impending death). This is why surgery is not a violation of the Hippocratic oath, specifically when they say "I will first do no harm", despite the fact that practically gutting someone is most certainly harmful.
To conclude, physically dominating someone is in no way a "kind" thing to do to someone, but it can certainly be done with kind intent (something I never disputed, all my previous post was saying was that to "make it kinder" would be to remove the BDSM aspect entirely). Because in this fic, it most certainly IS done with loving intent and kindness driving it from the very start. Any more love and kindness, and you'd have to replace the BDSM aspects for fluffy vanilla-sex bedroom play.
With BDSM, you really have to be able to wrap your mind around what I've just pointed out about driving sub-textual reasons, because without that crucial sternness backing the dom's actions, the dom loses the illusion of being dominant, which nigh-universally destroys the sexual fulfillment and enjoyment of the dominated party. (Kinda like telling someone to just imagine you've tied them to the bed, instead of actually breaking out the velvet ropes tied in one of a myriad of easily escaped knots. You have to have the illusion there, or it's not really going to be effective.)
Damn, that took me like +10 edits to get this to fully reflect what I was trying to convey. Also, I did NOT expect this to turn into such a massive text wall.
8376924
And yet, contrary to your bold claims, there are people who do enjoy being dominated outside a sexual context. One is typing this message to you right now. BDSM is not limited to sexual play.
I don't know how you've developed such strong opinions on the subject while being so thoroughly wrong, but you need to revisit your basic assumptions.
8376924
Your point appears to be to assert that exercising control over another person can categorically never be "kind", no matter what the circumstances, how the control is excercised, or what the controlled person feels about it.
I think this is error -- not because it misunderstands BDSM as others have claimed, but because it warps the everyday meaning of the word "kind" into uselessness.
We live in a culture that (for excellent reasons, if you ask me) assigns paramount importance to individual autonomy. You seem to have folded that value into your definition of "kind", such that "does not restricts someone's autonomy" becomes a requirement for the word "kind" to apply. But this means that you're losing the original meaning of "kind" -- I won't attempt a crisp definition here, but it is something about being mindful of, and motivated by, the recipient's desires and needs. If someone wants (in a particular situation and context) to be told what to do, then telling them what to do is definitely the kind way to behave towards them, even if in other situations telling someone what to do is not particularly kind behavior.
It is true enough that many BDSM activities do involve behavior that is not in itself "kind" -- say, if whips or demeaning words are involved, or (arguably) even passive restraints such as rope or cuffs. But this does not exhaust the range of BDSM. It is perfectly possible to have a BDSM scenario where the only thing that makes it BDSM is that one party decides what will happen and the other just follows instructions. Giving instructions is not in and of itself "unkind", and does not need to involve force or aggressive language. Specifically, it does not require that the sub is (or pretends to be) unwilling to follow the instructions. (Again, much BDSM roleplay does involve roleplayed unwillingness or resentment -- my point here is just that this is not mandatory).
This is so bizarrely cute.
I found my new home!
Rose has a happy