• Member Since 7th Jan, 2012
  • offline last seen Nov 15th, 2019

ScriptScrolls


More Blog Posts77

  • 457 weeks
    Alpha Mike Foxtrot - Part I

    So... I'm not dead--not literally anyway. I just kinda silently quit this whole thing. Why? Reasons I'm sure you've heard from everyone before and will only irritate you, so I'll spare you that. Suffice to say, I'm just not into it anymore. I like the writing aspect of it, but everything else became weird after I went to one of the cons. Despite what Wacka Flocka Flame said, shit's not gonna be

    Read More

    0 comments · 385 views
  • 551 weeks
    Mass chapter posting.

    I have a lot of completed chapters sitting around at the moment, four of which are for the new conspiracy story, one is for AHA, and one is for AHA's sequel.

    I've decided to post whatever I have the week I reach 40k views on this account. Figure it's something worth celebrating.

    0 comments · 424 views
  • 553 weeks
    Does anybody even read these any more?

    Like honestly, I've been dead on this site for pretty much an entire year if not more. Still trying to decide if I should even bother working on my current story... Does anybody even still read fanfiction? My star list has 96 chapters awaiting me. My Read Later is 41 things I will likely never read.

    You know what did it? One word.

    Trotcon.

    Read More

    6 comments · 552 views
  • 565 weeks
    That moment...

    ...when you realized you haven't done anything for so long that you stop receiving any meta notifications.

    11 comments · 465 views
  • 576 weeks
    Spelling of a certain alicorn's name

    Alright... I'm not sure if I've ranted about this before, but I will always, until my dying day, come hell or high water, spell it Princess Cadence. Why? Because if the writers of the show decide to use a dictionary word for a character's name, they better damn well stick to the dictionary spelling. What is the basis for changing her name to Cadance? They've tipped the

    Read More

    12 comments · 554 views
Dec
10th
2012

Somebody want a fun math problem? · 2:55am Dec 10th, 2012

Prove this:
e^πi=-1
And yes, it's actually true.
No cheating and looking it up.

Report ScriptScrolls · 336 views ·
Comments ( 20 )

Da buq does that even MEAN?!:rainbowderp:

592948 Read "E to the quantity of pi times I is equal to negative one"

you sir, make my brain hurt.

592960
Mmkay, I'ma gonna think about this REAL hard...
Urgh, now my head hurts. How the hay am I gonna prove THAT?!
I'll wait for a mathematically inclined person to show up.

That my friend is difficult. But I can't see how it's true unless it is (e^pi)i = -1

So I can only assume that e^pi is equivalent to 1 so that when you multiply by the imaginary square root of -1 which is basically just a replacement for a negative in the first place, then you get -1. Am I right?

593040>>593050
You need a basic knowledge of Taylor polynomials to make this happen; that's the only clue you get.

593094 It doesn't work that way considering you're not squaring i, and no, e^pi is equal to about 23.

593095
Taylor polynomials? Am I allowed to Wikipedia that?

Hmm. Then I'm stumped. I have no basic knowledge of Taylor polynomials... I'm a history major man...

Not sure why the hell I thought e^pi was equal to 1 though. That was stupid...

593142 Welcome to my world; I HATE vector spaces which makes up about 75% of my final tomorrow.

Just multiply both sides of the equation by zero.

593666 Multiplying by 0 could mean 2=-13. No, you can't do that in any proof.

Comment posted by ImChangingmynameforreaso deleted Dec 10th, 2012

It won't let me post the entire thing, but I did a 6th grade math project on it (yes, calculus in 6th grade) and it's basically if you add the Taylor series (function expressed as a polynomial) of cos(x) to the Taylor series of sin(x) multiplied by i you get the Taylor series of e^ix. This means e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x). Plug in pi and you're done.

I'm so smart. I win.

596987 Bingo, but I just started with the Taylor series for e^x and plugged in ipi and seperated the ones with an i and ones without an i

597002 Yeah, I'm a bit fuzzy on it, I was probably wrong up to the e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x). Comments from the mobile site aren't working btw.

Login or register to comment