And to think Han Solo's response was ad libbed. Also, have either of you heard the fan theory that Indiana Jones was actually Han dreaming while he was frozen in the Carbonite?
I only found out about it a few days ago myself, and that's because a friend of mine filled me in on it, after looking at me with a death glare for not know that fan theory and the Batman fan theory.
Yeah, while some of the theory sounds alright, there's a lot of fallacies in it.
Basically, Batman gets thrown back in time after defeating the ultimate evil in the DC universe, and he finds himself in a familiar setting. His armor is destroyed, so he grabs a nearby coat. It doesn't take him long before he realizes it was the night his parents were murdered, after seeing his younger self and his parents walking in an alley.
So, naturally he follows them in search for the killer, only to find that they were alone. It wasn't until Batman placed his hands in his pockets that he realized a revolver was in it. That's when it hit him: he was the one that killed his parents that night. He had a choice to make: save his parents, don't become Batman and doom the multiverse, or kill his parents to save it.
So he approaches the family, and shoots his parents, then runs off. Unable to bear what he's done, he climbs the top of the highest bridge, and jumps off to the icy depths below. A boat finds the body, and pulls it out. It's deathly pale, but he's still alive. As the boatman calls the cops, he hears something from the body...laughter. He laughs like he's heard the funniest joke in the world, but doesn't quite remember the punchline.
That's the theory. I'm sure it's pretty obvious what that implies at the end. As I said, there's fallacies in this theory
3563305
And to think Han Solo's response was ad libbed. Also, have either of you heard the fan theory that Indiana Jones was actually Han dreaming while he was frozen in the Carbonite?
3567240 i never even heard of it until you said it.
3567249
I only found out about it a few days ago myself, and that's because a friend of mine filled me in on it, after looking at me with a death glare for not know that fan theory and the Batman fan theory.
3567264 Batman?
3567268
Yeah, while some of the theory sounds alright, there's a lot of fallacies in it.
Basically, Batman gets thrown back in time after defeating the ultimate evil in the DC universe, and he finds himself in a familiar setting. His armor is destroyed, so he grabs a nearby coat. It doesn't take him long before he realizes it was the night his parents were murdered, after seeing his younger self and his parents walking in an alley.
So, naturally he follows them in search for the killer, only to find that they were alone. It wasn't until Batman placed his hands in his pockets that he realized a revolver was in it. That's when it hit him: he was the one that killed his parents that night. He had a choice to make: save his parents, don't become Batman and doom the multiverse, or kill his parents to save it.
So he approaches the family, and shoots his parents, then runs off. Unable to bear what he's done, he climbs the top of the highest bridge, and jumps off to the icy depths below. A boat finds the body, and pulls it out. It's deathly pale, but he's still alive. As the boatman calls the cops, he hears something from the body...laughter. He laughs like he's heard the funniest joke in the world, but doesn't quite remember the punchline.
That's the theory. I'm sure it's pretty obvious what that implies at the end. As I said, there's fallacies in this theory