• Member Since 12th Aug, 2013
  • offline last seen 2 hours ago

Bad Dragon


I write so that one day I may finally stop writing and be free, but these damn new ideas keep finding ways into my brain. I need to write more to vent them out!

T
Source

Trixie steals Sunset Shimmer’s blood. She steals her heart too; hell, she steals her whole body.

As if that wasn’t enough, Sunset Shimmer gets targeted by a vampire-hunter and just tightly escapes the encounter only to fall prey to Trixie’s other urges.


This story won a reward in Sunset Shimmer + Villain writing contest.

Co-authors:
Evil Glow
FluttershyRocks

Chapters (1)
Comments ( 50 )
Huk

That was... hmm... something all right. Not my thing, but have a like :unsuresweetie:

12028333

Great story

It ought to be, you wrote it.

12028313 We may have added a one-too-many dashes of randomness into the collaboration.

12028339
Oh okay and I like it so far and hope it gets a lot of likes.

Huk

12028332

Because neither vampires nor bondage was ever my thing. Plus as 12028339 mentioned, the story reads a bit too random for my taste :unsuresweetie: .

Still, it made me laugh a few times, so it deserved a like :twilightsmile:

12028341 It's already has a better rating than any of my other stories. I guess your magic touch really did the trick.

12028344
Oh okay thanks for the like

12028345
Yeah it definitely does and thanks for the comment and compliment too.

12028344
Thanks for writing us those two comments. :heart: All sorts of replies are highly appreciated.
If I can ask, which parts or aspects of the story did you enjoy the most? :duck:

The figure loosened its cloak revealing a massive pair of breasts. She revealed much more than that of course but the breasts were really the only thing Sunset noticed.

“Oh boy! Big milkies!” Sunset exclaimed

And this isn’t supposed to be mature?

12028796 Look at any woman in the street. You'll notice that they have boobs, even though they are fully dressed.

There is nothing revealing in this story. But yes, women do have torsos. Torsos still exist even when they are dressed. Nothing mature about that. In fact, that is Everyone rated.

12028350 12028584 Do you concur, my co-authors?

12028851
Women have boobs, indeed. :ajsmug:

Huk

12028584

1. Puns :pinkiesmile:.
2. Boobies puns :pinkiegasp:!
3. Trixie and Sunset sucking each other :pinkiecrazy:

Best story this side of the equator! It is a must read for anyone above the equator, absolutely revolutionary, can't wait for this to be taught in public schools across antartica. Here take my likes

That wasn't the most atrocious thing I've ever read

I feel numb

12032134 This was our aim when writing, to create a story that will not be the most atrocious.

The second goal was to scar the reader's mind.

I will say this much. You may not know of Chloe from Life is Strange. She's exploitative, manipulative and generally a toxic influence in the protagonist (Max)'s life.

Trixie is that girl, but slightly more bearable. And she doesn't die in six different ways!

12034308 I'd love to see Chloe work in her sex dungeon. I bet it would be something to behold.

12034308
Who is Chloe and what is Life Is Strange?

12041496

Life is Strange is a video game.
Chloe... She's your protagonist's... dubious best friend.
To quote from the wiki on her personality

Personality
Chloe is a stubborn, mischievous, and rebellious young woman. She is the archetypal punk-rocker, expressed in both her music taste and style. She loves to get high, drink beer, and can be described as bold and very outgoing. She has a big mouth often making snarky comments, acts fearless and loves to take risks, which often gets her in trouble. She can be prone to angry outbursts, and has serious issues with abandonment and trust after her father's death, Max's move to Seattle, her mother’s remarriage to David and the disappearance of Rachel Amber. Due to all her bad experience over the years, she has become pessimistic and resentful of life, convinced that there wasn't really anyone who actually cared about her or who she could trust in.

She sometimes is very insensitive to other people's feelings, and may act selfish and possessive, always wanting her loved ones' attention for herself and getting jealous and resentful if they don't spare their time for her or don't act her way. She can also be very irrational and irresponsible, which often takes the form of blaming others for situations out of their control and avoiding any responsibility of damage caused by herself (i.e, when she says to Max that if she doesn't blame someone else, it's her fault), which even takes the extent of blaming her dead father for her misery; but she will in some instances eventually acknowledge when she was in the wrong and apologize. Nonetheless, Max is aware of Chloe's flaws but still cherishes her highly and considers her a "good friend who shows up when you need her". Chloe also is a very protective, devoted and faithful companion, though she tends to get too attached and obsessive. She is pretty straightforward with her (romantic) feelings for other people, and also very flirtatious and teasing. Despite her rough outward appearance, Chloe is actually a very insecure and anxious person, and her tough acting may be nothing more than a facade she built up to protect herself from further harm.

Did I say that Trixie is that girl? But less developed.
static.wikia.nocookie.net/life-is-strange/images/2/29/Chloe_.png/revision/latest/thumbnail/width/360/height/360?cb=20170925004113
She even has blue hair!

You mentioned Skin-Tight BodySuit. Maybe, you should make that a running inside joke. :facehoof:

I am sorry that I am so late, but I was busy poll-working (on 2024-11-05, worked from 06:00:00 AM until Midnight). Then, my country fell to the ChristoFascists (Apathy won with 37%, ChristoFascism came in 2nd with 32%, Democracy came in 3rd with 30%, and 1% wasted their votes on 3rd parties and independents (please, adopt Compulsory Voting in your country before your Liberty, Democracy, and Freedom die between Apathy and an Extreme Minority willing to walk on glass for voting for seizing power with far less than half the country supporting them)).

The story is very random. It is amusing. I like it.

12041795 Skin-tight clothes are present in half of my stories already.

Did you recount the votes to make sure they're correct?

I'm glad you liked our story.

12041913

Walabio

> "Skin-tight clothes are present in half of my stories already."

⸘Oh really‽ ¡I never noticed! :scootangel:

> "Did you recount the votes to make sure they're correct?"

I am in this place called California:

images.fallout.wiki/6/67/FNV_NCR_Flag.png

All voting is on paper. The ballots are human/machine-readable. All voters get ballot in the mail and can vote from home by mail. Sometimes something goes wrong or some people want to vote in-person. We have voting centers. I worked at VC 42 of the county (a section of the state).

The tabulators (machines) count the votes (all votes are human/machine-readable. we have the speed and accuracy of machines, but the vote can be hand-recounted.

We do count:

Arrive an hour before the polls open (early voting is in October). We check the numbers on all of the tamper-resistant seals:

upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e9/Pinnipeds_vertical_version_montage.jpg

I skip to the paper:

After checking the numbers on the tamper-resistant seals on the paper. we open the blank paper. 1 poll-worker count the blank paper not knowing what the number should be and them another poll-worker recounts the blank paper knowing neither what the number should be nor what the other poll-work found. All paper must be accounted.

After closing the polls, before sending the ballots to the tabulators (2 poll-works are with the ballots at all times) and before putting new tamper-resistant seals onto the blank paper and recording the new numbers, 2 poll-workers recount all ballots, blank paper and spoilt ballots —— ¡the numbers must balance! The total number of cast-ballots must equal the total number according to the EPollBooks.



I wrote a blogpost about mine experiences as a poll-worker.

As for the Apathy, I wrote a blogpost about it. Since it is short, I include it here.*

I wrote a blogpost about mine experiences as a poll-worker.

I also wrote about how the world is screwed on my blog, the Skeptics' Guide to Equestria, and Ukraine.

> "I'm glad you liked our story."

It was hilarious. Sure, it is 1 and done, but 1-shots are fine.

*

As you might have heard, ChristoFascists won the 2024 Election. This is an analysis about what went wrong and how the misnamed Compulsory Voting could have prevented this calamity ——it is too late now!:

Democracy died between apathy and extremism:

  • 37% did not vote.
  • 32% voted for ChristoFascism.
  • 30% voted for democracy.
  • 1% wasted their votes on 3rd parties and independents.

It looks like Trump lost a few voters. The reason he won this time is voter-apathy; if all of those who voted for Biden would have gotten off of their off their arses and bothered to vote for Harris, democracy will have won.

Compulsory Voting arose from fear of this scenario:

Let us suppose that over half the voters are apathetic and do not vote. Let us suppose that we have a minority if motivated extremists (willing to walk on broken glass for voting for their extremist ideology) making up less than a quarter of the population. The remainder support democracy.

The extremists can seize power with less than ¼th of the nation supporting them.

Compulsory voting is a misnomer:

We Americans are lazy voters. We should use the misnamed Compulsory Voting:

Invented in Australia with precursors going back to Athens and the Roman Republic, Compulsory Voting requires that voters either go to a voting center or return the return-envelope, for the ballot, signed and dated. One does not need to vote at the voting center or one can return the envelop signed and dated without a ballot. If one refuses to show up at a voting center or do not return a signed dated but empty return envelope, must pay a fine. Voters have the right not to vote (you can take a pony to water, but you cannot make the pony drink).

Since voters have to go to voting centers or return the signed and dated ballot-envelop, most voters do vote. It is common for over 90% of voters to cast a ballot.

Countries with Compulsory Voting get over 90% of the electorate to cast ballots. By forcing all to vote, compulsory voting keeps a minority of motivated extremists from seizing power. That is not far off of what just happened in the United States of America.

Democracy cannot endure if apathy allows motivated antidemocratic minorities of ideological extremists, to seize control.

12041954 It sounds like you had work cut out for you at the election. It would have been even more work if voting was obligatory.

Personally, I believe apathy is the right of every American.

Those who don't know who to vote for shouldn't be voting. Only informed people should vote.

12041959

Walabio

> "It sounds like you had work cut out for you at the election. It would have been even more work if voting was obligatory."

Compulsory voting is a misnomer:

One has to return the mail-ballot or go to a voting center. The point is that, since people have to mail back the ballot or go to the voting center anyway, most voters, as in over 90%, vote. As apathetic as many of these vo\ters are, most are not extremist and vote for moderate candidates.

> "Personally, I believe apathy is the right of every American."

They could be as apathetic as they want, as long as the mail back the envelope or go to the voting center. Luckily over 90% do vote under Compulsory Voting.

> "Those who don't know who to vote for shouldn't be voting. Only informed people should vote."

The trouble is apathy allowing motivated extremist minorities to seize power. This is how democracy dies. This is how democracy died in the United States of America:

For a century, apathy grew. if it would be a candidate, it would have came in last after the Republicrats and Democans.. Then it came in 2nd between the Democans and Republicrats. Now, Apathy won with 37%. Although apathy rules, Trump has a cult and the Trump-cultists, making 32% the population would walk in broken glass for voting for him. They worship a golden statue of Trump made in China:

media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/210226130555-01-golden-trump-statue-cpac.jpg

That is real. 10s of millions of Americans worship that tacky golden statue of Trump.

Most of the apathetic are not Trump-Worshippers. If they had to vote, they would not vote for ChristoFascists. It is too late now:

It seems very likely that the Republic of Gilead (the name of the country after the coup in the Handmaid's Tale) has fallen to ChristoFascism. we are screwed.

12041969

One has to return the mail-ballot or go to a voting center.

What happens if you don't do that?

most are not extremist and vote for moderate candidates.

Sometimes, you need an extremist at the helm.

Concessions are the result of moderate America. This is why we're approaching III World War.

They could be as apathetic as they want, as long as the mail back the envelope or go to the voting center. Luckily over 90% do vote under Compulsory Voting.

I don't think anything should be forced on people. People should be free to live their own life. The government should only enhance, that experience, not limit it.

The trouble is apathy allowing motivated extremist minorities to seize power. This is how democracy dies. This is how democracy died in the United States of America:

If apathetic people don't mind, I see no problem with it.

Most of the apathetic are not Trump-Worshippers. If they had to vote, they would not vote for ChristoFascists. It is too late now:

It's just 4 years. America will survive.

It seems very likely that the Republic of Gilead (the name of the country after the coup in the Handmaid's Tale) has fallen to ChristoFascism. we are screwed.

In the end, America isn't the government, but the people, and people haven't changed with this election.

12042070

Walabio

> > "'One has to return the mail-ballot or go to a voting center.'"

> "What happens if you don't do that?"

One pays a fine:

Fine-Philosophy:

The rich and powerful invented our current system. The current system has fixed fines which are nothing for the rich but life-destroying for the poor:

In the video, a woman lives in a city with limited parking. To get to work, she can to park illegally. She got a 300.00-U$D ticket and did not have the money and went to prison.

Musk parks wherever he wants, racking up hundreds of parking tickets because the fines are nothing to him.

A great solution the poor love and the rich hate is a percentage of income or wealth.

Saving the country from extremism is important. I would set the fine at 10% of income. I shall create an example, but for making it neutral, I shall use Slovenia because, I am sure that neither of us know anypony living there, and, speaking both of economics and elections, the Average Slovene is now richer than the average UKian because the UK screwed itself with BrExit:

Nataša is a starving University-Student. She is a full-time Student with a part-time job. She earns a myriad (10,000) Euros/Year. She does not vote. 10% of her income is 1 KiloEuro.

Borut is a rich industrialist earning 100,000,000.00 €UR (a myriad squared). He does not vote. He have to pay a fine of 10,000,000.00 €UR.

> > "'most are not extremist and vote for moderate candidates.'"

> "Sometimes, you need an extremist at the helm."

¡Certainly! ¡Gas the Jews! ¡Invade Poland!

Incase you cannot tell, that was sarcasm.

> > "'They could be as apathetic as they want, as long as the mail back the envelope or go to the voting center. Luckily over 90% do vote under Compulsory Voting.'"

> "I don't think anything should be forced on people. People should be free to live their own life. The government should only enhance, that experience, not limit it."

I agree, up to a point:

For society to function, we have to require people to follow basic rules:

"Your right to swing your arm ends at my nose"
——
Uncertain Origin

Citizens have to pay taxes and not defecate in the drinking water.

Everyone wants rights, but democracy requires responsibilities, like following traffic-laws so that one does not cause fatal accidents, for keeping society going. The United Nations lists 30 Human Rights. 1 common way of balancing rights and responsibilities is that for every, ght, one has a responsibility (they need not be paired, as long as the totals on each side match). I see voting as on both lists:

¡Voting is both an Human Right and a Responsibility!

> > "'The trouble is apathy allowing motivated extremist minorities to seize power. This is how democracy dies. This is how democracy died in the United States of America:'"

> "If apathetic people don't mind, I see no problem with it."

Their right to be apathetic effects me. If you had horrendous diarrhœa because your neighbors defectated into your drinking water, you might conclude that their right to defecate wherever they want impedes on your rights.

> > "'Most of the apathetic are not Trump-Worshippers. If they had to vote, they would not vote for ChristoFascists. It is too late now:'"

> "It's just 4 years. America will survive."

Trump openly says that he wants to be a dictator, and told the Dominionists, those wanting a Christian Theocracy) that they only have to put him in office 1 more time and that will be the last time they will have to vote.

> > "'It seems very likely that the Republic of Gilead (the name of the country after the coup in the Handmaid's Tale) has fallen to ChristoFascism. we are screwed.'"

> "In the end, America isn't the government, but the people, and people haven't changed with this election."

Yeah, the largest group are apathetic and the 2nd largest group forship a Golden Trump like a Golden Bull —— evidently, ¡the Dominionists do not read their Bible they claim to revere! ¡This is who we are!

12042292

One pays a fine:

One should not pay a fine for activity.

A great solution the poor love and the rich hate is a percentage of income or wealth..

Maybe a combination of both systems would be better, else homeless people would be above the law since they'd have to pay $0 for every fine.

Saving the country from extremism is important.

If apathy is your enemy, extremism is the opposite.

¡Certainly! ¡Gas the Jews! ¡Invade Poland!

Or being apathetic while Ukraine is unjustly being invaded by the occupator.

For society to function, we have to require people to follow basic rules:

People keeping to themselves shouldn't be against the rules.

Citizens have to pay taxes and not defecate in the drinking water.

Harming others is bad. But doing nothing is not.

Everyone wants rights, but democracy requires responsibilities

Let's assume that democracy is not the final system. There should be a way for the system to transition to the better one. If democracy fails, maybe that's a good thing.

> > "'The trouble is apathy allowing motivated extremist minorities to seize power. This is how democracy dies. This is how democracy died in the United States of America:'"

Democracy is a bad system. Maybe we'll find a better one.

Their right to be apathetic effects me.

Extremists' voting affects you. Should all people therefore be forbidden from voting?

If you had horrendous diarrhœa because your neighbors defectated into your drinking water, you might conclude that their right to defecate wherever they want impedes on your rights.

Now imagine arresting your neighbour for not doing that. For being apathetic to water poisoning.

Trump openly says that he wants to be a dictator, and told the Dominionists, those wanting a Christian Theocracy) that they only have to put him in office 1 more time and that will be the last time they will have to vote.

In the past decade, America has been apathetic. That's why Iran will have nukes. I find it hard to believe Trump will be apathetic. Maybe he'll finally do some things that should have been done decades ago.

the largest group are apathetic

Suffering may cure them of apathy.

Walabio #33 · 3 weeks ago · · 1 ·

12042670

Walabio

> > "'One pays a fine:'"

> "One should not pay a fine for activity.

Mostly, parking tickets are a cash-grab, not not blocking firehydrants is legitimate:

Given that Apathy poses an existential threat to democracies, fining nonvoters is justifiable.

Tying the fines to income or wealth makes them fairer than a fixed value.

> > "'A great solution the poor love and the rich hate is a percentage of income or wealth.'"

> "Maybe a combination of both systems would be better, else homeless people would be above the law since they'd have to pay $0 for every fine."

Since they have no money, they pay nothing anyway.

> > "Saving the country from extremism is important."

> "If apathy is your enemy, extremism is the opposite."

No. Extremism and Apathy are allies:

Apathy lets extremism win; the cultists worshipping the Golden Trump —— ¡their Holy Bible tells them not to worship a Golden Calf in Exodus! —— won with 32% of the support of eligible voters because 37% of eligible voters did not vote. Apathetic voters sitting on their arses are the reason the ChristoFascists won.

> > "'¡Certainly! ¡Gas the Jews! ¡Invade Poland!''

> "Or being apathetic while Ukraine is unjustly being invaded by the occupator."

That is complicated:

Ukraine was not an official ally. We could not send troops, but we send arms. Let us look at what the ChristoFascists plan to do:

They plan to stop supporting Ukraine and which support to the Russian Federation. Ukraine is doomed. Extremism throws Ukraine under the bus. That is not all:

Trump plans to pull out of Nato and not honor mutual-defense treaties. Putin will conquer the former Soviet Republics, China will annex Taiwan, and North Korea will annex South Korea. I wrote about this in the group Ukraine.

¿How is extremism better than moderation for Ukraine. Given that moderation gave weapons to Uraine and extremism supports Putin, it seems to me that moderation is better than extremism. for Ukraine.

I shall cite the war in Gaza:

Isral is rightly pissed that Hamas murdered almost a myriad Isrælis. In tits wrath, Isræl kills Palestinian Civilians. The moderates try to moderate the response of Isræl. Trump want to let Isræl depopulate the GazaStrip, thus wiping out Hamas, along with the civilians, as long as Trump can build a new beachfront resort on newly annexed coastal territory.

Extremism seems worse than moderation to me.

> "'For society to function, we have to require people to follow basic rules:'"

> "People keeping to themselves shouldn't be against the rules."

When the apathy of people hurts others, that is a problem. The burden is very light:

In California, we use Vote-By-Mail. All an apathetic voter would have to do is open the envelope, remove the return-envelope, sign and date it, and put it back into the mail. That is it. The beauty is that in countries with Compulsory Voting, over 90% of voters return a filled ballot (since I have to return the envelope anyway, I might as well vote) and average candidates selected in nations with Compulsory Voting are more moderate than nations without Compulsory Voting; (low turnout usually leave minorities of motivated extremists voting).

> > "'Citizens have to pay taxes and not defecate in the drinking water.'"

> "Harming others is bad. But doing nothing is not."

In this case not voting hurts others and the nonvoter too. It is like not paying taxes.

> > "'Everyone wants rights, but democracy requires responsibilities'"

> "Let's assume that democracy is not the final system. There should be a way for the system to transition to the better one. If democracy fails, maybe that's a good thing.

Historically, fascism and theocracy are bad.

> > > > "'The trouble is apathy allowing motivated extremist minorities to seize power. This is how democracy dies. This is how democracy died in the United States of America:'"

> "Democracy is a bad system. Maybe we'll find a better one."

Perhaps we shall, but we should keep democracy until we find the new system. Ditching democracy in hopes of finding something better is like trying to cross the ocean by jumping into the water and building a boat out of driftwood as one goes.

> > "'Their right to be apathetic effects me.'"

"Extremists' voting affects you. Should all people therefore be forbidden from voting?"

Apathy lets the extremists win. Compulsory Voting dilutes the extremism. As for getting rid of voting, then it would not be a democracy. ¿Which system would you like to replace it? Interestingly, one could make a case for sortition (filling offices randomly from the population).

> > "'If you had horrendous diarrhœa because your neighbors defectated into your drinking water, you might conclude that their right to defecate wherever they want impedes on your rights.'"

> "Now imagine arresting your neighbour for not doing that. For being apathetic to water poisoning."

It seems to me that defecating in the drinking water should be a crime. If you like shitty water, go for it, but I prefer shit-free water.

> > "'Trump openly says that he wants to be a dictator, and told the Dominionists, those wanting a Christian Theocracy) that they only have to put him in office 1 more time and that will be the last time they will have to vote.'"

> "In the past decade, America has been apathetic. That's why Iran will have nukes. I find it hard to believe Trump will be apathetic. Maybe he'll finally do some things that should have been done decades ago."

Giving 1 demented man unchecked power seems like a recipe for disaster. I have an example:

After his criming came out, President Nixon took to heavy drinking in 1974. Late in Nixon's term, as his paranoia and his abuse of alcohol grew out of control, Secretary of Defense James Schlesinger and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger instructed White House staff and the Joint Chiefs that any emergency orders from the president (particularly those that involved nuclear weapons) be approved by them 1st.

Imagine a demented man, out of touch with reality, just ordering a random nuclear strike against a random country. His marriage is 1 of convenience. Maybe, he will nuke Slovenia out of marital frustration.

> > "'the largest group are apathetic'"

> "Suffering may cure them of apathy."

But, ¿will we have election for them to vote?

12042734

Mostly, parking tickets are a cash-grab, not not blocking firehydrants is legitimate:

They take the risk. Sometimes risks don't pay.

Given that Apathy poses an existential threat to democracies, fining nonvoters is justifiable.

The system doesn't matter. People matter.

Since they have no money, they pay nothing anyway.

But they can get in debt with fixed fines.

37% of eligible voters did not vote. Apathetic voters sitting on their arses are the reason the ChristoFascists won.

I bet aesthetics are fine with it.

That is complicated:

Ukraine was not an official ally. We could not send troops, but we send arms. Let us look at what the ChristoFascists plan to do:

America vowed to protect Ukraine from invasions. In exchange, Ukraine gave up on all of its nuclear arsenals.

Ukraine should not have trusted America to keep its end of the deal. If they had nukes now, they could have defended themselves. America is responsible for the mess they're in. America disarmed them, and now they can't fight back.

Trump plans to pull out of Nato and not honor mutual-defense treaties. Putin will conquer the former Soviet Republics, China will annex Taiwan, and North Korea will annex South Korea. I wrote about this in the group Ukraine.

Sounds about right. But I think WW III will be needed to achieve all that.

¿How is extremism better than moderation for Ukraine. Given that moderation gave weapons to Uraine and extremism supports Putin, it seems to me that moderation is better than extremism. for Ukraine.

Extremism will support Israel even more.

Isral is rightly pissed that Hamas murdered almost a myriad Isrælis. In tits wrath, Isræl kills Palestinian Civilians. The moderates try to moderate the response of Isræl. Trump want to let Isræl depopulate the GazaStrip, thus wiping out Hamas, along with the civilians, as long as Trump can build a new beachfront resort on newly annexed coastal territory.

Can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.

Extremism seems worse than moderation to me.

There are hard things that need to be done. Moderation will never even attempt them.

When the apathy of people hurts others, that is a problem. The burden is very light:

Apathy should be our constitutional right.

Compulsory Voting

Voting should be reserved for those who care.

In this case not voting hurts others and the nonvoter too. It is like not paying taxes.

It worked wonderfully for Trump supporters. They weren't hurt by apathy at all.

Historically, fascism and theocracy are bad.

I think Trump has his own system in mind.

Perhaps we shall, but we should keep democracy until we find the new system.

That wouldn't work. However, maybe we can evolve democracy into that other system. Apathy might be the first necessary step.

Ditching democracy in hopes of finding something better is like trying to cross the ocean by jumping into the water and building a boat out of driftwood as one goes.

Hey, if your boat named Democracy is sinking, you might as well do that; and rip some of the planks of the ship while you're at it.

¿Which system would you like to replace it?

Dictatorship is great, as long as you have the right dictator at the helm.

Look how smart China is. It plays a long game. America can't even see one year into the future.

It seems to me that defecating in the drinking water should be a crime.

Indeed. But not shitting and not cleaning should not be a crime. People can be apathetic if they want.

Giving 1 demented man unchecked power seems like a recipe for disaster.

Or salvation.

America having a moderate government is the reason why we're approaching WW III. They had decades to act and they didn't. Now shit will hit the fan.

Imagine a demented man, out of touch with reality, just ordering a random nuclear strike against a random country. His marriage is 1 of convenience. Maybe, he will nuke Slovenia out of marital frustration.

Don't get me wrong, I don't like Trump. But young people are forbidden from the presidency. Only old people may apply. Blame the system.

But, ¿will we have election for them to vote?

The bottom line is, Trump won fair and square under the current democratic system. Everything is as it should be.

You have 4 years to convince people to vote for Woke agenda instead. Good luck with that.

12042788

It takes over an hour just to respond. ¿How about we go to closing arguments? I shall let you go 1stly.

12043249 Freedom is the most important aspect of society.

I don't mind making voting easier, but I do mind the fines even though a person isn't hurting anybody with her passivity. Not voting means you're voting for all the candidates because you don't care who's in charge.

12043436

Apathy allows motivated extreme minorities to win, thus hurting all. Experience shows that the higher the turnout, the more moderate the winning politicians are, with the most moderate politicians winning in countries with "Compulsory Voting".

¡Great Debate!

12043466 Great debate. I always love agreeing to disagree with you.

12042788
This is a long message

12043743 And this is a short message.

12044434 Hot.

I mean, you're hot.

I mean... Oh, never mind.

12044529
So have you made a new story yet?

12044531 No. Been busy in RL. Have you written a new story yet?

12044568

In your opinion, ¿who won the debate?

Wearing those dislikes like badges of honor. Same as always, eh?

12048584 It's just 30. I saw worse.

And there are 18 upvotes, so it can't be all bad (because it's a collaboration, so it's not all Bad).

Login or register to comment