So, chapter three of Marked for Evil just got published, and this is the first chapter where I really made a big change from the movie or musical. In fact, I made two. I'll talk about the Canterlot trip in the blog post for next chapter, and right now, I kind of have imagined three blog posts to go with chapters three, four, and five talking about what I changed when adapting, what I added, and what I got rid of. So, let's talk about change. Also, we'll be spoiling chapter three and also
I'm writing this to go along with chapter two of Marked For Evil, and I thought instead of just saying "Chapter Two's out, read it now," I could talk about why I'm writing this beyond the obvious fact I really like both the film and musical version of Heathers.
Ok, so by now, I think I've gone through enough stories to talk about things from the source material that aren't going to be a factor. Most of the reasons why they're omitted should be kind of obvious, but I want to run through them anyway. Note: I love all the things I'm about to talk about, and it hurts me to not include them, but they're not best for this story. I'm just explaining my reasoning why.
Heathers stands as one of the most diabolically insightful and venomous black comedies I've ever seen, that takes the standard self-righteous teenage comedy/drama that John Hughes and his ilk produced and brutally deconstructs it in a fantastically demented way, and I love it so much for that.
A DIFFERENT POINT OF VIEW an MLP Science Fiction tale. Ever stop to think what even the most routine magic would be like to a technological race? What if they accidentally got in the way of Luna's adjustment of the moon?
I am also just beginning to rewrite a Grumpy Goat <tail> that is not on this blog yet. I will post both versions of: FOR THE LOVE OF ANNIE One version will be presented as a regular GRUMPY GOAT <tail>
Gosh, it's been a while since I last reviewed one, I'll tell ya that.
So, today, I will be making my eighth review on a television program, and quite likely one of the shortest reviews I’ve done, by analyzing "The Scooby-Doo Show".
Paul Thomas Anderson's second film is a fascinating, intentionally sprawling examination of the lives of those sucked into the California porn industry in the late 1970s through the early 1980s, and not only provides a unique lens in which to view the time period, also manages to humanize these characters, while still highlighting the exploitative and demeaning elements of the industry, coupled with the allure of stardom and fame that it promises.
12/10—a complete masterpiece; flawless and outstanding 11/10—Excellent, near-perfect film 10/10—the standard rating; awesome film with a couple of flaws 9/10—a wonderful film with several flaws 8/10–a great film with numerous flaws but not enough to ruin it
>think gay thoughts >sometimes think Dislestia thoughts >other times think Lunbra thoughts >pepsi is better than coke >Yakko >this laptop is stoopid >TAKE A BREAK RUN AWAY WITH US FOR THE SUMMER >HONEY WHATCHU WAITING FOR >where's nagi she needs her salad slap >THERE RIGHT THERE >GAY OR EUROPEAN >Sassbra >1 divided by 0 >fekkin sleep dammit >i s t h i s t h e r e a l l i f e >cats >more cats >gawd cats are adorable >memes >more gay thoughts >gayer thoughts
Support us
Chat!