• Member Since 14th Jun, 2012
  • offline last seen 40 minutes ago

Bendy


I like big ponies and I cannot lie.

More Blog Posts929

  • 4 weeks
    A story based on this image would be nice

    I think it would be quite cute. Art by icey.

    derpibooru link: https://derpibooru.org/images/3327595

    3 comments · 134 views
  • 10 weeks
    My thoughts on Stellar Blade

    Her ass is not fat enough. That is all.

    Ponies got much better asses.

    2 comments · 171 views
  • 23 weeks
    MLP Gen5 Butts are too small

    Seriously, they are. This is by far the most important issue, if they made their asses fatter it would improve viewership. If they made the ponies thicc prudes would complain, which would only draw in even more viewers. Twilight Sparkle, the protagonist of the series has a fat ass, and her teacher Princess Celestia, who's ass is even fatter.

    Read More

    16 comments · 318 views
  • 25 weeks
    I don't like anthro

    The main reason is uncanny valley. When something looks human but not quite. A perfect example would be a robot trying to mimic being human, it looks unsettling. It's somewhat insulting towards the ponies, you have Twilight Sparkle there a beautiful unicorn and you can't embrace her just because she's not fully in human shape, even though she has all the qualifications to be a sapient-minded

    Read More

    17 comments · 256 views
  • 29 weeks
    The attacks on anime are ridiculous

    I am sorry about this blog, but anime as in japanese cartoons made in japan are under attack by western moral puritans, because it doesn't adhere to their moral standards. This strikes me as a very imperialistic mindset, not everyone has to adhere to our values.

    Read More

    10 comments · 335 views
May
12th
2017

Dictatorships In Google Docs Groups? · 1:43pm May 12th, 2017

What's your view on dictatorships in Google Docs groups? As in the original author of the story, and owner of the story and the Google Doc has the right to ban anyone from the group as they see fit. Doesn't matter if they worked with them for years, but if they do add things the original author doesn't like, and argue they won't change or remove it even though the original author wants it removed. Then it gets worse when more than one member disagrees with the original author.

I firmly believe the original author should hold absolute power. Who can merely ban anyone from the doc group as he sees fit, and replace them with new guys. No ifs, ands or buts, if you annoy the original author to the point he feels like you are hijacking his story and generally ruining it, you get the boot.

What about you?

Report Bendy · 615 views · #Dictatorship #Google Docs
Comments ( 7 )

Well I totally agree with you there.

Since the main author created this piece of art, his opinion rules! I mean you can have editors and stuff to point things out, but only the main author can make the changes happen.

4529583

Exactly. How would you feel if say three editors added and changed stuff you disliked in your story and refused to remove it? Would you feel like they are stealing and ruining your story, instead of actually helping?

However, how would you feel if they added something you liked, but also agreed to remove the things they added you disliked?

4529587
Well. That is the good thing in gdocs. You can set it so every change has to be 'signed off' by yourself. So if you like a change, you accept it; if not, you decline it.

To the 2nd thing: It is good then right? I mean its a win-win situation then. Get things added you like and things removed you didn't like.

Totally agree. Author should have the final say

Suggestions are any editor's friend.

Besides that though, while the author should have the last say... let the editor have a say before that, though. Anything they do will always have a reason (which is usually to better the story), so try asking why they made a certain edit.

Of course, if they ignore you, they allowed themselves to be ignored, but if not, well, friendship is magic I'll see myself out now.

I agree and disagree with you.

I agree with the fact that the story in google docs belongs to the one who wrote the story to begin with.

But I also disagree.

If I want to publish a work on google docs and allow other people to tinker with it, that means that I am open to all types of criticism and wether I like it or not matter little for it is there because I am willing to approach other people who, to begin with, I trust enough to see the story/novel and change parts of the story that they believe it will make either the story better, have a better feel to it or just remove/add parts to either me certain scenarios more detailed or remove unnecessary details so that the readers don't get bored.

I, as an author, can ther agree with the changes being made or not, but I'll never go to the levels of removing the person from those who can alter the story.

The reason behind that is quite simple (at least to me): freedom of speech.

If I silence someone by removing him/her from the group of people who can alter my stories that means that I am far to sensitive and delicate to handle all ways of thinking that don't fit with my comprehension of the world, its rules and laws. I will always welcome all types of ideologies and concepts of how the world works, so that way I'll be able to gain a different approach on how to handle different scenarios for the story itself,

I am a fanatic of freedom of speech and I shall never silence someone because we think differently; on the contrary, I will actively search that/those person/people so I can find a middle ground in which we both agree. And if I can't find a common ground then I will try my very best in understanding where does their ideology(ies) come from. That way I'll be able to understand them better as a person and where their ideologies come from.

Thus, this will allow me to expand my vocabulary, understanding of words and events and overall make me a better author/writer.

4529587
The best solution for scenarios like that is quite simple.

Have one document in google docs and the same document in word. That way, you have the original document safe from being tinkered by the other three editors and that way you can compare your own work and the work with the editing of the three editors without risking anything.

Login or register to comment