• Member Since 25th Sep, 2012
  • offline last seen 10 hours ago

Walabio


A Skeptic & So Also Therefore Now A godless Agnostic Atheist

More Blog Posts77

Nov
10th
2016

¡A Dark Day for America and the World! · 5:49am Nov 10th, 2016

The racists sexist xenophobic misogynous ignorant people got their way and elected the misogynous xenophobic sexist racist lying ignorant mendacious Puppet of Putin.

Comments ( 33 )

Mmm, let the salt flow. Your WW3 wish is your problem, not mine.
Oh, and I love how Trump's the criminal, while Hilarry ACTUALLY should be in jail for life, for treason. And for colluding with the media. And for funding ISIS. But nope, Donny's the criminal cuz he's a meanie.

4294916

⸘What the buck did you smoke‽:

She made the mistake of setting up her own eMailServer, but that did not break laws. Bengazi was unforceeable. As for funding Dæsh, that is just plain insane. This talk of locking up the political opposition is what 3rd-world dictators do, like the mentor of Trump Putin does to his opposition.

The Apple Lies covered the molehill which became a mountain when Applejack lied to cover her error and made things worse. If Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would have admitted that running an eMailServer herself was a mistake and apologized, this would have blown over years ago; but sadly however, she dodged the issue out of embarrassment which caused it to snowball into an huge distraction.

You need to have your head checked before you end up like those TrumpSupporters I encountered a month ago who honestly believe that Bill Clinton goes around raping women and then Hillary shows up and murders the raped women so that they cannot talk.

4295533 So, it's all a big conspiracy?
And Trunp supporters are the delusional ones?
kek

4295540

Let us look at 1 of you claims:

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly gave money to Dæsh. Present your evidence.

Just so you know, I do not accept claims from mentally ill people wearing tinfoil-hats, so please do not bother linking to conspiracy-sites.

4295622 Which, lemme guess, is WikiLeaks?
Furthermore, your logic:
Trump's racist? Show me evidence of that. Without consulting leftist media.

4295686

He openly characterizes Mexicans as murderers and rapists:

Do you agree that is his voice? or ¿do you claim overdubbing?

4295696 ... reports the leftist media.
I said, WITHOUT the leftist media.
I'm making a point of your logic. Please tell me you get that.

4295858

Question:
¿Do you claim overdudding? or ¿do you acknowledge that Trump said these things? I am sure that this is all just overdubbing:

Yes, it is all overdubbing.

¿Have you considered psychiatric help?

4295894 Wow. The shit-for-brain can't figure out I'm literally using his logic against him.
The kek truly flows free.

4296044

You make no sense at all.

I shall backup because we are too far into crazy town and we need to step back:

I shall not accept as evidence the rant from the guy wearing a tinfoil-hat. If you have real evidence, even on the site of the guy wearing a tinfoil-hat, then fine. I need documentation. As it is, you seem almost as crazy as the guy in the park raving that fluoridation, vaccines, and GMOs are a Jewish plot to dumb us all down.

4296044

I supported my claims, although you seem to believe that YouTube is Left-Wing Media and those clips of Trump saying things is overdubbing. I asked for documentation for just 1 of your outrageous claims, that Hillary Clinton knowingly gave money to Dæsh. I do not accept schizophrenic delusional rants (anyone can say or write anything, as your incredible claims demonstrate), but accept verifiable documentation on conspiracysites — — only the conspiracysites talk truth to power, or so they claim —— but, so far, you gave me nothing. If you do not give me documentation by the end of the weekend, I shall consider your outlandish claims withdrawn.

I suggest that you practice skepticism:

If one naively believes claims, one is gullible and people will take advantage of one. If one does not accept claims just because they come from authority, one will reject many true claims, and since one has to believe something, alternate conspiracytheories work their way into one's mind (conspiracy theories are not necessarily wrong, because, as any historian will tell you, Confederacy-Loyalists plotted to decapitate the Government of the USA, which culminated in simultaneous assassination-attempts against President Lincoln, Vice President Johnson, and the Cabinet, which succeeded in the assassination President Lincoln and severely injuring Secretary of State Seward). Skepticism is a very simple process:

# 0 . Do not accept claims without sufficient evidence.
# 1 . When one has sufficient supporting evidence, accept the claims.

Skepticism is not perfect, but it is better than nothing. It reduces gullibility without veering too far into denialism and unsupported conspiracies.

I personally invite you to join a skeptical group:

The Skeptics' Guide to Equestria

Okay. Clearly, the criminal who organizes riots and funds our enemies, as well as does not care for our borders or american life, and even claims that a wuarter of the country are irredemable in her eyes should be president. Sure. When you elect the next Big Brother, we'll be looking at you.

4302366

Support your claims The only thing you wrote with truth in it is that the racists whitesupremists are deplorable, which is a true claim

4303101 Well- I'm a Trump supporter. Clearly, I'm a white supremasist even though I'm slavic.

4303197

> "Well- I'm a Trump supporter. Clearly, I'm a white supremasist even though I'm slavic."

Non Sequitur:

Whether or not you are slavic is irrelevant and slavics are european.

The claim that about 50% of Trump-Supporters being racists is true:

fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/rngs/USA-ELECTION-RACE/010020H7174/USA-ELECTION-RACE.jpg

The true figure is the ultimate answer to everything, 42%.

4303474 Not even gonna argue. Not worth it. :unsuresweetie:

4303485

I did not ask you to argue; I asked you to cite your sources. You made these claims:

> "Clearly, the criminal who organizes riots and funds our enemies, as well as does not care for our borders or american life, and even claims that a wuarter of the country are irredemable in her eyes should be president. Sure."

Since you cannot support any of your claims except the Hillary Clinton claiming that ¼ of Americans are racists (she said that about half of Trump-Supports are racists and about half of Americans support Trump, but polls show that about half of Trump-Supports are racists, so this is a true statement). Since you cannot support your claims, I consider that you conceded that your claims are false.

4303582 No, I just don't think it's worth it to argue with you.

4303921

No, I just want you to cite your vacuous claims. Here is some advice, If you can find no support for the rants you read on FaceBook, the claims are probably false. You really need to learn Skepticism:

# 0 . Do not accept claims without sufficient evidence.
# 1 . When one has sufficient supporting evidence, accept the claims.

Skepticism keeps one from being gullible or a deniar. I invite you to join a group devoted to skepticism:

The Skeptics' Guide to Equestria

¿Do you even care whether what you say and believe is true or not?

4304094 Fine.
Hillary sells weapons to Isis: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/wikileaks-confirms-hillary-sold-weapons-isis-drops-another-bombshell-breaking-news/
Hillary supports riots through shear lack of adressing the matter. 'nuff said.
Basket of deplorables refers to 1/4 of US.
The immigration for Clinto is pretty weird- she's pretty much been avoiding giving a concrete (no pun intended) answer to the questionand has jumped around. Here an article dealing with Trump and Clinton's opinions: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/15/compare-candidates-clinton-vs-trump-immigration/

4304288

> "Fine.
Hillary sells weapons to Isis: http://thepoliticalinsider.com/wikileaks-confirms-hillary-sold-weapons-isis-drops-another-bombshell-breaking-news Hillary supports riots through shear lack of adressing the matter. 'nuff said.

Not enough said:

That is the transcript of an interview. JULIAN ASSANGE claims that he has the email. I claim to be Scootaloo, but that does not make it so. Please link to the email. It is no secret that we want to topple Assad, but You fail to show that we gave weapons to Dæsh. Indeed, the only weapons I know we give to Dæsh are bombs we drop on it.

> "Basket of deplorables refers to 1/4 of US."

We established that about half of America supports Trump and half of Trump supporters are racist. ¿Why do you beat a dead pony?

The immigration for Clinto is pretty weird- she's pretty much been avoiding giving a concrete (no pun intended) answer to the questionand has jumped around. Here an article dealing with Trump and Clinton's opinions: http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/15/compare-candidates-clinton-vs-trump-immigration

We already know that Trump wants to build a wall and deport 11 million illegal immigrants. I suppose that your point is that Hillary Clinton has a workable immigration policy, while Trump has an unworkable policy. If Trump is serious about deporting people for violating immigration-laws, he can start by deporting Melania Trump for working on a tourist-visa and move onto a 4th wife.

4304528 Look, I don't have time to looks for needles in haystacks or elaborately argue a point. I'm tired, I have schoolwork, and I really am not interested in trying to convince one person that the facts are correct because there's no point.

4304654

The reason you cannot deliver is because you got nothing; both softwarebots and humans have gone through the 1,700 emails and found nothing interesting. The interview was an attempt of Putin to sway the election —— ¡our leader is a puppet of Putin —— who supplied the hacked emails —— ¡nothing like foreign governments manipulating our elections (at least the leader of the FBI, Comey, did not violate the Hatchet-Act and try to manipulate the election by announcing 9 days before the election that he found some more emails which turned out to be a lot of nothing)!

4304980 Why in blue hell are you still arguing?

4305248

I do not argue; I teach you skepticism. You do not want to end up like those whackjobs believing in chemtrails (those are condensationtrails) ¿do you?

4305837 Are you trying to convert me to leftism and scientology at the same time?
Plus, I'm pretty much as much of a cynic as you can get.

4306043

¡Scientology! I should sick Xenu on you for that accusation. Skepticism is a simple algorithm for believe true things:

* Do not accept claims without sufficient evidence.
* If on has sufficient evidence, then accept the claim

People believing everything they hear are gullible. People refusing to accept claims with lots of evidence such as, just a few examples, biological evolution, round Earth, Heliocentrism, et cetera, are deniers. This might interest you:

Paul Horner admits to creating many false stories for TrumpSupporters, which he posted on his fake news sites and hearned him hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I wonder how many of the stories he invented you believe. You made these claims:

Hillary Clinton organizes riots and funds our enemies, as well as does not care for our borders or american life. I asked you repeatedly to support your claims. I wonder how many of these claims Paul Horner created.

It is up to everyone to not be gullible and not be a denier. True factchecking claims before accepting or rejecting them them. Please be skeptical.

4306657 Look, I frankly just don't care enough to look through hundreds of transcripts and thousands of emails.

4306703

¿Do you care at all whether what you accept or reject is true or not? You should neither accept nor reject claims without o evidence. If you are not willing to research a claim, You should neither accept nor reject it. You should only reject claims because the evidence indicates that they are wrong. You should only accept claims if evidence indicates that the claim is true ¿What is wrong with you? If you cannot bother to research a claim, you should neither accept nor reject it. ¿Do you know that factchecking sites exist to help you sort through the claims, complete with references and citations?:

FactChecking

* FactCheck.Org
* Fact-Checker —— The Washington Post
* PolitiFact

Urban Legends & Hoaxes:

* UrbanLegendsOnline.Com
* Snopes.Com: Rumor Has It
* Urban Legends

If you reject true claims or believe false claims, that is on you. If you cannot be bothered to factcheck a claim, ¿could you at least neither accept nor reject it?

4306794 I'm not going to add to this blatant lie directed at me.

4306818

I do not lie; you admit that you believe things without bothering to check whether they are true or not. That is a recipe for believing false claims and rejecting true claims. You already accept false claims. You are responsible for what you believe. ¿Could you try to vet your believes?

4307194 Look, I've fact checked these before. But now the election's over, there's no point trying to get more votes for Trump. I'm on vacation on that duty until the next election.

4307832

You are never on vacation from making certain that what you believe is true or not. I shall give an example:

Let us suppose that you decide to believe in homeopathy (magical water). You develop cancer with a 90% 5-year survival rate with Science-Based Medicine (surgical removal of the tumors, irradiation of the area for hopefully killing stray cancercells, and chemotherapy for killing stray cancercells which found their way into the blood and lymph and are now scattered throught the body) but a 10% 5-year survival rate without treatment. If you choose homeopathy over Science-Based Medicine, you have a 90% chance of dying within the next 5 years. Skepticism helps protect your health and your wealth. Indeed, that reminds me of a video with that very message:

¡Lack of Critical thing can hurt your health and your wealth!

Login or register to comment