• Member Since 27th Sep, 2012
  • offline last seen April 4th

Snowy


More Blog Posts10

  • 438 weeks
    Mechanics Advice: Footnotes (Self-Demonstrating Version)

    For the non-self-demonstrating version, go here.


    Footnotes*! To do them right, enclose (2) the number (c), and use exactly the same format in-text and at the footnote (4). Asterisks are right out*****.

    *These things right here.

    Read More

    5 comments · 1,768 views
  • 459 weeks
    I know, I'm late to this party...

    My grandparents were in town. We had a great time, but it did take up all of my time. So now I have to post this belatedly.


    In other surprising news: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov

    0 comments · 421 views
  • 489 weeks
    Miss the old site search?

    I never really used the old site search. But I'm told it was a google-powered site search. The good news is, you can get the same thing on your own. Simply search google however you usually would, but add "site:fimfiction.net" (no quotes) to the end of it. But that's kind of annoying. Is there a better way?

    Probably.

    Read More

    0 comments · 635 views
  • 507 weeks
    xkcd: now applicable to fimfiction with depressing frequency

    I think I'm going to get a lot of use out of this one.

    1 comments · 364 views
  • 514 weeks
    Story Tagged Blog Etiquette

    The most important thing to remember when posting a story-tagged blog is the intent of the feature. The story tag feature is intended to let you inform readers about things relevant to the story. It is not intended to let you turn people tracking your story into people following you. If your blog post is not relevant to the story, don't tag the story. That

    Read More

    0 comments · 531 views
Nov
20th
2015

Mechanics Advice: Footnotes (Self-Demonstrating Version) · 10:55pm Nov 20th, 2015

For the non-self-demonstrating version, go here.


Footnotes*! To do them right, enclose (2) the number (c), and use exactly the same format in-text and at the footnote (4). Asterisks are right out*****.

*These things right here.
(2) Use parentheses, square brackets, curly braces...it doesn't matter what you use as a delimiter, other than aesthetically, but put something on either side of the number. This minimizes the probability of extraneous results when the find tool (which is the easiest way to navigate footnotes when chapters are many screens long) is used.
(c) You can use letters if you really want to, I suppose. Usability-wise it's just as good, though it might be easier to miss and it is less common.
4. Not like this, dammit! This messes with the natural usage of the find tool. Same thing goes for "4)" or whatever other variation you might think looks nice.
*****If you're using at most one footnote in a chapter, you can get away with an asterisk. However, if you have more than one footnote, a find for the first usage will turn up the first usage, the second usage twice, the third usage thrice, and so on. Go on, give it a try here.

Comments ( 5 )

Wonderful! (1)

(1) I can almost hear Pratchett's ghostly applause.

A little outdated now that we have superscript1 and subscript2 options, ain’t it?

1. Admittedly, superscript looks better and is often used to indicate footnotes anyway.
2. Alternatively...

4590701
Perhaps. But this rant is motivated by usability, not aesthetics. From a usability perspective, superscript footnotes are inferior to bracketed footnotes (though you could of course always use a bracketed superscript footnote.(1) The thing is, unlike with physical books (where footnotes are on the same physical page), there can be quite a lot of distance between a footnote and the reference to the footnote in the text. The convenient way for a reader to find the footnote and then their place again is to have exactly the same text marking both the reference and the referent, and have that text be something that is unlikely to show up in other places on the page (unadorned numbers don't work for that). This makes it very easy to navigate back and forth with ctrl-F.

(1) Like this

You know, there's actually built-in support for footnotes1 now!

Using the [footnote]Insert your footnote here![/footnote] tags!

  1. Though they don't use brackets, which is annoying.
Login or register to comment