>>281604281604 Both of them?

i like your Stories

>>254753254753 I noticed. But why?

I watch you

>>207983207983 Thanks a lot, I'm fine with it. Glad we could come to an agreement, and sorry for being a bit rude.

If you have something to tell me about my story, you can do so in the story comments, if you want to.

>>207836207836 I changed my bio slightly; hopefully it will suit you (and others) more.

I don't know if there was a confusion or miscommunication, but whatever I wrote in my bio never meant to intend that I thought following masses of people was my idea. I wanted the reason as a whole (it's a combined reason; a combined goal of what others are doing here on FiMFiction) to be my trademark, but I don't mind that other people do it as well. I have nothing against that, and if they so choose to do it, that's their choice. Like Donus and Meta follow lots of people, others watch authors because of their significant works, others watch new authors because of a new story, etc. I just wanted to be recognized as doing everything/all of that as a whole, but I never meant (if it seemed as such) to claim that doing so was my invention.

So... with that being said, I just want to leave old arguments and misconceptions in the past and move on. And if you want, I can still help with critiques on your story.

~Follower

>>207791207791 You know, if you were so noble and generous as you make yourself look to be, you would tolerate others watching a lot of accounts too. (Like The Watcher)

You could have asked nicely, instead you put a note like

"PLEASE DO NOT TAKE MY IDEA OF FOLLOWING PEOPLE FOR INSPIRATION, MOTIVATION AND PRAISE - I created this account to stand apart from everyone else, and I will not appreciate nor tolerate it if you try to copy my idea. - unlike a certain someone I know (angry emoticon)"

- which made me leave this unfriendly comment on the user page of your second account (I didn't mean to come across a snob, though), as you made it seem like you invented the concept of following for the aforementioned reasons and not allowing other to do the same, which makes you look pretentious,

Especially as you're really not standing apart that much. A lot of people watch accounts with no stories. And I mean a lot. And help out, too. I myself do that, too. And you're really not the first to come up with the "idea" to watch as many users as possible. Meta Knight does that too and has been doing so for months.

It's really nothing that special to watch a lot of users (and help them out), so that particular note where you claim to have "invented" that idea, struck me as very unjustified. I had no intent to decry and do not have anything against you personally.

>>207664207664 I meant to give some suggestions as to how to make your story better. Apparently, you're just trying to decry me. Why do you feel the need to do this?

You know, you don't have to be so mean about the Follower's account - I'm just trying to inspire new authors and users as well. I'm pretty sure nobody watches accounts with no stories, except me. Because I, for one, do PM people and try to help them with their upcoming stories.

I'm sorry I ever came across your account. And I'm not posting my real username link everywhere to get more fame. If they want to see my bio about me, they can access it there. If they want to learn more about the Follower's bio, then that's what's on that page.

--hannahs98

>>207128207128 Apparently you misunderstood me. I didn't ask you to look at my story (I'm not that hungry for views, likes or anything), I was under the impression you saw my story and started following me because of that, as this is the reason you gave me when I asked on your user page.

I will take a look at your story as soon as my schedule loosens up a bit. I promise, and if I forget by the end of the weekend, send me a PM and I"ll take a look right away.

I try to keep my promises as best I can.

~hannahs98 (a.k.a. the Follower)