I know I've been deathly silent to the masses since the last chapter, and I've been working on the next one. Anyway, here's some stuff for all of you: My first strike from EQD's pre-readers. This is the e-mail response I got. Bear in mind that I requested the same pre-reader as last time. (I won't give a name, etc.)
Dear Aynine,It had been so long since I'd read this fic, I had to go digging to find bits and pieces of the original review.
I'll quote it here:
I love your ideas: the hidden histories, the dark magics, the ‘older’ feel for the ponies we know. These are good things, and you should strive to keep whatever muse gives them to you very happy.The ideas behind the story are compelling, but the manner in which you tell it is clumsy, conflicting, and at times feels more like a breathless train of thought than a well-considered tale.
You have a fixation on the thesaurus, but aren't attentive to the nature of the words you're replacing. You'll use words that have similar meanings to what you intend, but do not belong, or cannot be modified by the adjectives and adverbs in which they are dressed.
None of these things have changed. You still have a compelling, deep story to tell. You have a unique tone with which to relate the tale. But you're falling apart in structure and form.
Run-on sentences and comma splices abound. Heavy purple prose fairly strangles the scenes you are trying to build.
I'm not saying you must do these things. I am saying, though, that until you do, this story will not be suited for Equestria Daily. The overly florid prose and difficult-to-parse construction would receive rather negative responses from the readership there, and they wouldn't give your tale the attention it so richly deserves.
This is your first strike of three. If you intend to seek publication on EQD, please request the attentions of a skilled proofreader and/or editor--or more than one, as different readers will find different problems--who won't be reluctant to shake a given paragraph until the unnecessary parts fall off.
There are many groups on FimFiction where you can pick up a proofreader. I’d suggest going to The Proofreader Group. If you already have a proofreader, then I’d suggest requesting another, more experienced one.
If you’re serious about making this story as good as it can possibly be, then after finding a proofreader and revising, you should submit it to a review thread such as The Training Grounds on Ponychan or MLPchan. Alternatively, you could submit it to one of the FimFiction review groups such as WRITE, School For New Writers, or The Equestrian Critics Society. Many authors find their reviews more helpful and less discouraging than an Equestria Daily rejection letter. Plus, they can probably tell you when your story is ready to be resubmitted.
All the best in your revisions,
[Identifier Redacted]
I've been through the grinder of Ponychan's WTG and a few reviewer threads in times of old, and while I learned a lot a huge story is very unattractive. On top of this you're at the mercy of the skill of the person who picks it up. This leads into why I dislike using the specific reviewers. They're led by what they like, and not what is necessarily correct or proper. As a result, I've rejected critique in the past because I felt it was irrelevant or inconsequential (and was later proved right). You can choose reviewers more directly affiliated with EQD (though they ARE bias) for a more... appropriated indication of the flaws in your story for, I guess, what is favored there. That is the best shot, but it feels like cheating and like I would be learning with restrictions.
This critique is confusing from various angles, but most of all in that it carries a lot of firsts for me. My older readers know that I've submitted to EQD something like 4 times in total now. Of such critiques, I have only ever been accused of lacking things. So to say I have purple prose now--a first from anyone who has openly commented or I have asked--is odd. Mind you this is something that allegedly didn't change from the previous version, which I felt was overly bare and most have concurred with.
~Run-on sentences. I feel that this can be subjective. I probably have some, but at the same time some are probably viewed as such with very black and white views of sentence structure. My studies have shown me that sentences can be acceptable (and sometimes favored) against basic writing rules, though I don't make it my mission to break them.
~Comma splicing. I'm inclined to agree with this. I tend to both over or under-use them and it's something I've actively been trying to watch out for. This probably stems unconsciously from the way I speak. (I'm strange like that.)
Anyway. Like 75% of EQD critique, it's vague and lacks specific examples. (You have errors... somewhere. Use the Force to find them, lad!) I don't hate EQD and I'm grateful to my pre-reader, especially looking it over after I specifically requested them after such a long period. Can any of you guys offer examples that you have seen? I'm always striving to improve, but it's like navigating a labyrinth with a compass instead of a map, and where preference and interpretation line the walls that stop me. I'm deterred from using the suggested groups because of past experiences. I'd also much, much rather learn without the fandom looming over me.
Edit: Consider this just an insight into my perspective. I'll take it down soon. It has, however, brought me a pleasant surprise. More info eventually.