Anarcho-capitalism: Why it's bullshit · 10:41pm Nov 20th, 2012
Anarcho-capitalists have always fascinated me. Why on earth would you say that we, the people, need any more money? We need LESS money, first of all, up to the point of nothingness. If you have an individual with more money and an individual with less money, the one with more money controls the one with less money, right? Seems sane to me so far. Or rather, insane, but whatever. So, you have no government, no laws and no state, only people with more money and less money. How's that gonna help anyone? The rich ones still profit, the poor ones still starve and whoever owns the most, owns society. Besides, the very term "anarcho-capitalism" is an oxymoron. Anarchism rejects any and all forms of authority and control. Money instills control and authority. The one with more money is a bigger authority figure, right? So, again, you have the poor man, with no say in society, with no property and nothing to speak of but pure slavery in the name of the "anarchists" on top. SOUNDS REASONABLE TO ME.
And then, this one dude I met on omegle by accident, starts farting out of his dick and saying shit like "socialism brought us here" and "we live in socialism". If this piece-of-shit capitalist fascist dictatorship is "socialism", I'm a fucking potato and then some. And once again, he starts saying utter bullshit like "socialism uses lies and trickery to make the people work" and "socialism is a tyrannical society.". Oh yes, of course. A society where people work for the benefit of the whole and self-benefit is bad? A society where people do that because they fucking want to and not because some bullshit "social norms" tell them to is bad? A society where the people decide what they want to do DIRECTLY and without the "aid" of the government is bad? Well fuck me, excellent logic on that one, good sir.
Seriously, an-caps, stop calling yourself anarchists. You're a bunch of neo-liberal asswipes.
That is all.
Amen